Active Users:628 Time:31/10/2026 09:06:45 AM
"Military may lift ban on women in submarines" (Reuters) Burr Send a noteboard - 28/09/2009 08:26:30 PM
~snip~

Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the top U.S. military officer, advocated the policy change in written congressional testimony distributed by his office to reporters on Friday.

"I believe we should continue to broaden opportunities for women. One policy I would like to see changed is the one barring (women's) service aboard submarines," Mullen said.

Navy Secretary Ray Mabus said he was "moving out aggressively on this."

"I am very comfortable addressing integrating women into the submarine force," Admiral Gary Roughead, chief of naval operations, said in a statement.

~snap~
||||||||||*MySmiley*
Only so evil.
Full article at Yahoo! News
Reply to message
"Military may lift ban on women in submarines" (Reuters) - 28/09/2009 08:26:30 PM 984 Views
gives new meaning to the old joke.... - 28/09/2009 09:47:36 PM 678 Views
Ahahahahaha! *NM* - 28/09/2009 10:02:01 PM 322 Views
seems like a strange choice to me - 28/09/2009 10:26:24 PM 727 Views
if you can't keep it zipped - 28/09/2009 11:35:35 PM 702 Views
Correct and yet it happens all too frequently already. - 29/09/2009 12:43:15 AM 703 Views
In my mind, that's a pretty pathetic arguement. - 29/09/2009 01:02:31 AM 754 Views
WHOA! - 29/09/2009 01:14:27 AM 661 Views
Dude I know!! - 29/09/2009 01:20:27 AM 701 Views
Hehehe, we could "name the show". - 29/09/2009 01:26:11 AM 658 Views
XD Or even better!!! - 29/09/2009 01:40:50 AM 708 Views
ROFL! - 29/09/2009 01:47:07 AM 629 Views
Really the possibilities are endless. - 29/09/2009 01:48:34 AM 680 Views
Indeed. - 29/09/2009 02:46:31 AM 658 Views
~Plays devils advocate~ Lets pretend... - 29/09/2009 02:54:03 AM 778 Views
By that same token, should women also be banned from long business trips? *NM* - 29/09/2009 03:23:22 AM 323 Views
only the ones who don't charge for their services? *NM* - 29/09/2009 03:36:03 AM 355 Views
Haha!! Touche! I concede that point. *NM* - 29/09/2009 11:59:33 PM 316 Views
Re: ~Plays devils advocate~ Lets pretend... - 29/09/2009 03:23:31 AM 663 Views
It might be true in some situations, but it's a weak argument against this issue. - 29/09/2009 05:15:47 AM 728 Views
subs are really really cramped. Ever heard the phrase hot racking? - 29/09/2009 03:23:33 PM 810 Views
Well said *NM* - 29/09/2009 03:59:13 PM 372 Views
"The military is instrument of war not social engineering." Excelent point. *NM* - 30/09/2009 12:34:28 AM 401 Views
oh please will people stop the “it worked with segregation argument” - 29/09/2009 03:01:48 PM 678 Views
keep in zipped is such a bad argument - 29/09/2009 02:51:45 PM 747 Views
A submariner's perspective - 29/09/2009 08:30:45 AM 724 Views
Interesting. - 29/09/2009 09:55:11 AM 735 Views
a rack is just the name for a bed - 29/09/2009 03:30:05 PM 675 Views
Re: a rack is just the name for a bed - 29/09/2009 03:57:10 PM 725 Views
Re: a rack is just the name for a bed - 29/09/2009 04:46:12 PM 877 Views
It is amazing what you can get used to - 29/09/2009 06:03:05 PM 684 Views
Re: Interesting. - 29/09/2009 04:42:54 PM 795 Views
See, that's a good reason. - 29/09/2009 01:29:32 PM 695 Views
before you knock the return to high school argument - 29/09/2009 10:39:47 PM 677 Views
which i think is just silly in the terms of greater age-related legalities - 30/09/2009 12:08:46 AM 710 Views
You have to cut with the grain. - 30/09/2009 03:05:29 PM 620 Views
Re: before you knock the return to high school argument - 30/09/2009 01:10:35 AM 710 Views
It is a strange mix - 30/09/2009 02:56:21 PM 625 Views
Thank you for talking some sense. *NM* - 29/09/2009 06:46:33 PM 405 Views
Thank you for taking the time to answer. Well done. *NM* - 30/09/2009 12:07:49 AM 308 Views

Reply to Message