Active Users:627 Time:31/10/2026 09:08:05 AM
my favorite joke from Navy basic training (mature readers only, poorly veiled sexual reference) imlad Send a noteboard - 28/09/2009 10:06:51 PM
"Submarines: 150 men go down, 75 couples come up."

But when we learned that the Navy (this was back in '04) was considering commissioning subs for women only crews, I amended it to

"Submarines: 150 women go down, and go down again, and again, and again."

My lesbian friends loved that one (these were the girls that told me the joke "What do lesbians bring with them on the second date? A turkey baster.";)


"what's long and hard and full of seamen?"
Death to the Regressives of the GOP and the TeaParty. No mercy for Conservatives. Burn them all at the stake for the hateful satanists they are.
Reply to message
"Military may lift ban on women in submarines" (Reuters) - 28/09/2009 08:26:30 PM 984 Views
gives new meaning to the old joke.... - 28/09/2009 09:47:36 PM 678 Views
Ahahahahaha! *NM* - 28/09/2009 10:02:01 PM 322 Views
my favorite joke from Navy basic training (mature readers only, poorly veiled sexual reference) - 28/09/2009 10:06:51 PM 759 Views
seems like a strange choice to me - 28/09/2009 10:26:24 PM 728 Views
if you can't keep it zipped - 28/09/2009 11:35:35 PM 702 Views
Correct and yet it happens all too frequently already. - 29/09/2009 12:43:15 AM 704 Views
In my mind, that's a pretty pathetic arguement. - 29/09/2009 01:02:31 AM 754 Views
WHOA! - 29/09/2009 01:14:27 AM 661 Views
Dude I know!! - 29/09/2009 01:20:27 AM 702 Views
Hehehe, we could "name the show". - 29/09/2009 01:26:11 AM 658 Views
XD Or even better!!! - 29/09/2009 01:40:50 AM 708 Views
ROFL! - 29/09/2009 01:47:07 AM 629 Views
Really the possibilities are endless. - 29/09/2009 01:48:34 AM 681 Views
Indeed. - 29/09/2009 02:46:31 AM 658 Views
~Plays devils advocate~ Lets pretend... - 29/09/2009 02:54:03 AM 779 Views
By that same token, should women also be banned from long business trips? *NM* - 29/09/2009 03:23:22 AM 323 Views
only the ones who don't charge for their services? *NM* - 29/09/2009 03:36:03 AM 355 Views
Haha!! Touche! I concede that point. *NM* - 29/09/2009 11:59:33 PM 317 Views
Re: ~Plays devils advocate~ Lets pretend... - 29/09/2009 03:23:31 AM 664 Views
It might be true in some situations, but it's a weak argument against this issue. - 29/09/2009 05:15:47 AM 728 Views
subs are really really cramped. Ever heard the phrase hot racking? - 29/09/2009 03:23:33 PM 811 Views
Well said *NM* - 29/09/2009 03:59:13 PM 372 Views
"The military is instrument of war not social engineering." Excelent point. *NM* - 30/09/2009 12:34:28 AM 401 Views
oh please will people stop the “it worked with segregation argument” - 29/09/2009 03:01:48 PM 678 Views
keep in zipped is such a bad argument - 29/09/2009 02:51:45 PM 748 Views
A submariner's perspective - 29/09/2009 08:30:45 AM 724 Views
Interesting. - 29/09/2009 09:55:11 AM 736 Views
a rack is just the name for a bed - 29/09/2009 03:30:05 PM 676 Views
Re: a rack is just the name for a bed - 29/09/2009 03:57:10 PM 726 Views
Re: a rack is just the name for a bed - 29/09/2009 04:46:12 PM 877 Views
It is amazing what you can get used to - 29/09/2009 06:03:05 PM 685 Views
Re: Interesting. - 29/09/2009 04:42:54 PM 795 Views
See, that's a good reason. - 29/09/2009 01:29:32 PM 695 Views
before you knock the return to high school argument - 29/09/2009 10:39:47 PM 678 Views
which i think is just silly in the terms of greater age-related legalities - 30/09/2009 12:08:46 AM 710 Views
You have to cut with the grain. - 30/09/2009 03:05:29 PM 621 Views
Re: before you knock the return to high school argument - 30/09/2009 01:10:35 AM 710 Views
It is a strange mix - 30/09/2009 02:56:21 PM 626 Views
Thank you for talking some sense. *NM* - 29/09/2009 06:46:33 PM 405 Views
Thank you for taking the time to answer. Well done. *NM* - 30/09/2009 12:07:49 AM 308 Views

Reply to Message