Active Users:2312 Time:18/06/2026 01:28:11 AM
my favorite joke from Navy basic training (mature readers only, poorly veiled sexual reference) imlad Send a noteboard - 28/09/2009 10:06:51 PM
"Submarines: 150 men go down, 75 couples come up."

But when we learned that the Navy (this was back in '04) was considering commissioning subs for women only crews, I amended it to

"Submarines: 150 women go down, and go down again, and again, and again."

My lesbian friends loved that one (these were the girls that told me the joke "What do lesbians bring with them on the second date? A turkey baster.";)


"what's long and hard and full of seamen?"
Death to the Regressives of the GOP and the TeaParty. No mercy for Conservatives. Burn them all at the stake for the hateful satanists they are.
Reply to message
"Military may lift ban on women in submarines" (Reuters) - 28/09/2009 08:26:30 PM 932 Views
gives new meaning to the old joke.... - 28/09/2009 09:47:36 PM 621 Views
Ahahahahaha! *NM* - 28/09/2009 10:02:01 PM 294 Views
my favorite joke from Navy basic training (mature readers only, poorly veiled sexual reference) - 28/09/2009 10:06:51 PM 705 Views
seems like a strange choice to me - 28/09/2009 10:26:24 PM 680 Views
if you can't keep it zipped - 28/09/2009 11:35:35 PM 656 Views
Correct and yet it happens all too frequently already. - 29/09/2009 12:43:15 AM 644 Views
In my mind, that's a pretty pathetic arguement. - 29/09/2009 01:02:31 AM 701 Views
WHOA! - 29/09/2009 01:14:27 AM 614 Views
Dude I know!! - 29/09/2009 01:20:27 AM 635 Views
Hehehe, we could "name the show". - 29/09/2009 01:26:11 AM 605 Views
XD Or even better!!! - 29/09/2009 01:40:50 AM 656 Views
ROFL! - 29/09/2009 01:47:07 AM 578 Views
Really the possibilities are endless. - 29/09/2009 01:48:34 AM 630 Views
Indeed. - 29/09/2009 02:46:31 AM 608 Views
~Plays devils advocate~ Lets pretend... - 29/09/2009 02:54:03 AM 725 Views
By that same token, should women also be banned from long business trips? *NM* - 29/09/2009 03:23:22 AM 292 Views
only the ones who don't charge for their services? *NM* - 29/09/2009 03:36:03 AM 329 Views
Haha!! Touche! I concede that point. *NM* - 29/09/2009 11:59:33 PM 293 Views
Re: ~Plays devils advocate~ Lets pretend... - 29/09/2009 03:23:31 AM 620 Views
It might be true in some situations, but it's a weak argument against this issue. - 29/09/2009 05:15:47 AM 662 Views
subs are really really cramped. Ever heard the phrase hot racking? - 29/09/2009 03:23:33 PM 762 Views
Well said *NM* - 29/09/2009 03:59:13 PM 347 Views
"The military is instrument of war not social engineering." Excelent point. *NM* - 30/09/2009 12:34:28 AM 370 Views
oh please will people stop the “it worked with segregation argument” - 29/09/2009 03:01:48 PM 626 Views
keep in zipped is such a bad argument - 29/09/2009 02:51:45 PM 696 Views
A submariner's perspective - 29/09/2009 08:30:45 AM 674 Views
Interesting. - 29/09/2009 09:55:11 AM 682 Views
a rack is just the name for a bed - 29/09/2009 03:30:05 PM 625 Views
Re: a rack is just the name for a bed - 29/09/2009 03:57:10 PM 674 Views
Re: a rack is just the name for a bed - 29/09/2009 04:46:12 PM 827 Views
It is amazing what you can get used to - 29/09/2009 06:03:05 PM 631 Views
Re: Interesting. - 29/09/2009 04:42:54 PM 742 Views
See, that's a good reason. - 29/09/2009 01:29:32 PM 631 Views
before you knock the return to high school argument - 29/09/2009 10:39:47 PM 623 Views
which i think is just silly in the terms of greater age-related legalities - 30/09/2009 12:08:46 AM 654 Views
You have to cut with the grain. - 30/09/2009 03:05:29 PM 548 Views
Re: before you knock the return to high school argument - 30/09/2009 01:10:35 AM 660 Views
It is a strange mix - 30/09/2009 02:56:21 PM 566 Views
Thank you for talking some sense. *NM* - 29/09/2009 06:46:33 PM 381 Views
Thank you for taking the time to answer. Well done. *NM* - 30/09/2009 12:07:49 AM 277 Views

Reply to Message