Active Users:749 Time:08/11/2025 01:48:04 PM
You do realise that's not her personal twitter account, right? Spriteling Send a noteboard - 16/09/2012 12:57:13 AM
Have you considered advertising your Twitter account somewhere other than RAFO?


Rather, it's a twitter account dedicated to site news and other SF&F book/tv/game/etc news.
Reply to message
EDIT: We don't have ads; we don't need the (still not removable) Twit-box to be one. *NM* - 15/09/2012 11:10:35 AM 800 Views
We have ads? - 15/09/2012 06:00:36 PM 1009 Views
I must have gotten confused with another site. My mistake. - 15/09/2012 11:53:51 PM 929 Views
Don't you think you've complained about that enough already? *NM* - 15/09/2012 07:07:30 PM 492 Views
Can I get rid of it yet? No? Then obviously I haven't. *NM* - 15/09/2012 11:55:34 PM 444 Views
Here. I wrote a new post for you. - 15/09/2012 07:47:23 PM 1006 Views
You don't have to be passive-aggressive just because you're in charge of the perpetual annoyance. - 15/09/2012 11:55:08 PM 966 Views
You do realise that's not her personal twitter account, right? - 16/09/2012 12:57:13 AM 948 Views
And ads. I don't particularly care whose Twitter account it is; I just want it removeable. - 16/09/2012 03:55:19 AM 952 Views
Ah yes, that was me. - 27/09/2012 01:27:19 PM 1038 Views
What ads? - 16/09/2012 04:17:49 AM 939 Views
We covered this above *NM* - 16/09/2012 04:36:29 AM 472 Views
I think I speak for all of rafo in saying that your tears have become an end in themselves. *NM* - 16/09/2012 10:59:42 AM 562 Views
RAFO runs on user lacrimation. *NM* - 16/09/2012 12:24:16 PM 470 Views
*gets out whip* >.> *NM* - 16/09/2012 02:24:27 PM 535 Views
It's unobtrusive. - 17/09/2012 03:08:21 PM 909 Views
Re: It's unobtrusive. - 27/09/2012 01:27:56 PM 1100 Views
Getting rid of the tweet box in 5 easy steps - 17/09/2012 08:57:54 PM 1426 Views
10 thumbs up. Well done. *NM* - 17/09/2012 10:25:04 PM 511 Views
*NM* - 18/09/2012 03:29:09 AM 536 Views
What if the tweetbox were moved into a RAFO chat? - 17/09/2012 09:53:29 PM 1009 Views

Reply to Message