Active Users:373 Time:17/06/2025 08:45:26 PM
The replay officals are not replacements. Maybe Rodgers just isn't a clutch QB *NM* random thoughts Send a noteboard - 25/09/2012 11:44:29 AM
Your refusal to listen to the real reasons that the real refs need to be brought back (lack of understanding of the basic rules, lack of control of the game, etc) is just your style... you couldn't make an argument that might be construed as being pro-union if your life depended on it.

But now, with the Packers getting jobbed on Monday Night Football, the refs have cost a team the game. yeah, the regular refs might have made the same mistake, the basis of all your arguments has been that the refs haven't cost anyone a game yet. Now they have, in egregious, embarrassing form.

The league needs to overturn that decision. They won't, it would be conceding defeat against the union and the NFL has already shown that they are willing to sacrifice the quality of their product in order to flex their financial muscles.

But you are out of excuses. As of now.
Reply to message
A good point regarding the replacement officials - 24/09/2012 02:55:12 PM 965 Views
You must not be watching the games - 24/09/2012 05:09:20 PM 517 Views
And there you have it. (Monday Night Football update.) - 25/09/2012 05:18:37 AM 497 Views
That was the right call. "Union" has nothing to do with it. - 25/09/2012 11:37:39 AM 618 Views
No, it was not. And yes, it does. - 25/09/2012 05:11:52 PM 412 Views
^This +1,000,000 *NM* - 25/09/2012 05:20:51 PM 233 Views
The replay officals are not replacements. Maybe Rodgers just isn't a clutch QB *NM* - 25/09/2012 11:44:29 AM 213 Views
Hmm? - 25/09/2012 05:01:26 PM 476 Views
Like DK I was being a smart ass - 25/09/2012 06:17:12 PM 477 Views
I agree with Cannoli, sadly. These officials are not much worse if at all. - 26/09/2012 01:51:30 AM 670 Views
I love the replacement refs - 26/09/2012 04:25:42 PM 444 Views

Reply to Message