Active Users:395 Time:01/05/2025 09:27:12 PM
It was a sideline from the major point and not my motivation, as Dannymac insinuates. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 25/09/2012 04:09:48 PM
Pressuring the the league into knuckling under to the officials' demands will not greatly improve the quality of the game, possibly not even in the short-term (as the replacements get better, and the unionists' skills deteriorate with unuse), and it will be another cost to be passed onto the fans. And the officials' union will gain clout, prestige, moral authority, whatever you want to call it, and officiating reforms will be even harder to put through, as the union resists anything that might embarass or replace its constituency.


what is all this about if you're not trying to make an anti-union argument?
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
A good point regarding the replacement officials - 24/09/2012 02:55:12 PM 952 Views
You must not be watching the games - 24/09/2012 05:09:20 PM 509 Views
And there you have it. (Monday Night Football update.) - 25/09/2012 05:18:37 AM 486 Views
That was the right call. "Union" has nothing to do with it. - 25/09/2012 11:37:39 AM 608 Views
why the union comments at the end of your post if it had nothing to do with your argument? - 25/09/2012 03:38:28 PM 498 Views
It was a sideline from the major point and not my motivation, as Dannymac insinuates. - 25/09/2012 04:09:48 PM 497 Views
No, it was not. And yes, it does. - 25/09/2012 05:11:52 PM 400 Views
^This +1,000,000 *NM* - 25/09/2012 05:20:51 PM 228 Views
The replay officals are not replacements. Maybe Rodgers just isn't a clutch QB *NM* - 25/09/2012 11:44:29 AM 208 Views
Hmm? - 25/09/2012 05:01:26 PM 464 Views
Like DK I was being a smart ass - 25/09/2012 06:17:12 PM 468 Views
I agree with Cannoli, sadly. These officials are not much worse if at all. - 26/09/2012 01:51:30 AM 653 Views
I love the replacement refs - 26/09/2012 04:25:42 PM 434 Views

Reply to Message