Active Users:586 Time:01/01/2026 11:56:48 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
He was being sarcastic. See our earlier posts about Romo and Eli Manning *NM* Dark Knight Send a noteboard - 25/09/2012 05:21:16 PM
No one is gonna look at that game and say Rodgers played well by his standards, for sure. Though he did lead the team to the go ahead touchdown, gaining points when needed. This after being sacked eight times in the first half. So while he may not have been GOOD last night, it is hard to argue that he isn't clutch.

And the primary plays in question happened with him on the sideline.

So what are you talking about?
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
Reply to message
A good point regarding the replacement officials Cannoli - 24/09/2012 02:55:12 PM 1036 Views
You must not be watching the games Dark Knight - 24/09/2012 05:09:20 PM 567 Views
"still doesn’t understand how timeouts or challenges work. Advantage: replacement refs." REALLY?! Joel - 24/09/2012 07:21:41 PM 771 Views
You see what you did, Cannoli? You made me agree with Joel *NM* Dark Knight - 24/09/2012 07:41:02 PM 222 Views
Only fair; you and rt made me agree with Cannoli in the Eli vs. Romo threads. Joel - 24/09/2012 11:35:22 PM 634 Views
And here's a straight-up "caused one team to be able to win" situation: Jragghen - 24/09/2012 09:39:33 PM 785 Views
"it's a basic expectation of any referee to maintain an accurate line of scrimmage." Joel - 24/09/2012 11:43:06 PM 750 Views
And there you have it. (Monday Night Football update.) Dannymac - 25/09/2012 05:18:37 AM 547 Views
That was the right call. "Union" has nothing to do with it. Cannoli - 25/09/2012 11:37:39 AM 669 Views
why the union comments at the end of your post if it had nothing to do with your argument? moondog - 25/09/2012 03:38:28 PM 558 Views
It was a sideline from the major point and not my motivation, as Dannymac insinuates. Cannoli - 25/09/2012 04:09:48 PM 563 Views
No, it was not. And yes, it does. Dannymac - 25/09/2012 05:11:52 PM 479 Views
^This +1,000,000 *NM* Dark Knight - 25/09/2012 05:20:51 PM 260 Views
The replay officals are not replacements. Maybe Rodgers just isn't a clutch QB *NM* random thoughts - 25/09/2012 11:44:29 AM 237 Views
Hmm? Dannymac - 25/09/2012 05:01:26 PM 529 Views
He was being sarcastic. See our earlier posts about Romo and Eli Manning *NM* Dark Knight - 25/09/2012 05:21:16 PM 223 Views
Like DK I was being a smart ass random thoughts - 25/09/2012 06:17:12 PM 528 Views
Maybe Rodgers should have played at his apparent high level of play the entire game. *NM* callandor1000 - 26/09/2012 01:52:40 AM 233 Views
maybe people should rate QB simply by which team wins the game *NM* random thoughts - 26/09/2012 05:43:04 PM 230 Views
QBs should in part be rated on wins. I mean, that is afterall the result desired. callandor1000 - 27/09/2012 02:36:04 PM 599 Views
I agree with Cannoli, sadly. These officials are not much worse if at all. callandor1000 - 26/09/2012 01:51:30 AM 737 Views
there is a huge difference between blowing a call and not understanding the rules of the game moondog - 25/09/2012 03:35:44 PM 536 Views
I love the replacement refs Praziquantel - 26/09/2012 04:25:42 PM 502 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes