Active Users:584 Time:16/09/2026 05:40:06 PM
The biblical narrative states an act of CONCEPTION without an act of SEX. Joel Send a noteboard - 25/10/2012 10:37:48 PM
The term I should probably be using is sexual assault and not rape. God didn't rape Mary for there was no penis inside vagina sex, yet he did sexually assault her without her consent.

Sexual Assault (which I associate in my mind with rape, but which I will try to separate the two for this discussion for legally they are different things) unlike Rape can be any unwanted sexual contact. Forcing to carry a baby to term without any consent is a violation of a women.

But it doesn't matter for in the bible Mary accepted her role to be the mother of god.

No sexual anything, assault or otherwise. I know how that sounds: How is conception possible without sex? Same way it is possible without sperm: Act of God.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
every time a republican candidate mentions rape, i think of the following video - 25/10/2012 05:58:16 PM 994 Views
WTF was that?!?!?!?!? *NM* - 25/10/2012 06:22:46 PM 393 Views
I am SO GOING to get flamed for asking this - 25/10/2012 08:45:21 PM 658 Views
No, because God did not have sex with Mary. - 25/10/2012 09:23:12 PM 783 Views
Following that logic - 25/10/2012 09:25:11 PM 672 Views
Think of it in terms of The Merchant of Venice. - 25/10/2012 10:28:42 PM 651 Views
Closer than Roland, but still off. - 25/10/2012 09:51:12 PM 667 Views
The point I am horrible job making is this - 25/10/2012 10:12:53 PM 670 Views
The biblical narrative states an act of CONCEPTION without an act of SEX. - 25/10/2012 10:37:48 PM 626 Views
Seems it depends on the legislation you're in. - 25/10/2012 10:50:09 PM 639 Views
One other thing - 25/10/2012 10:14:27 PM 642 Views
Fine by me; I am catholic, not Roman Catholic. - 25/10/2012 10:30:46 PM 653 Views
It's a bit more ambiguous than that. - 25/10/2012 10:39:15 PM 641 Views
It certainly does not say that - 26/10/2012 01:15:45 AM 645 Views
Evidently the Onion heard you - 26/10/2012 01:18:10 PM 928 Views
New GOP Congressmen daily refute the GOPs pretended support of rape exceptions to abortion bans. - 25/10/2012 10:07:21 PM 935 Views
This is not a source I generally resort to, but let me quote John Cornyn: - 25/10/2012 11:11:04 PM 645 Views
I think he is an idiot for saying it - 25/10/2012 11:53:01 PM 655 Views
How cynical. - 26/10/2012 12:02:14 AM 737 Views
Realist, thankyouverymuch - 26/10/2012 12:14:38 AM 616 Views

Reply to Message