i've always favored district lines by ZIP code myself
moondog Send a noteboard - 05/11/2012 10:05:59 PM
Look at North Carolina, where Democrats engineered a district to ensure a minority representative (Democrat, of course) would emerge. It happens all over the place on the part of both parties and it's gross. Moreover, I think that the courts have been too permissive of the districts. They taught us in school that gerrymandering was not allowed, but now it is.
They should use a universal formula: take the southwest corner of your state and draw a square, expanding it until you reach a district size of population. Then move east and keep doing it, and then shift the borders slightly if, at the end of the process, you have a narrow strip at the top of the state. Period.
They should use a universal formula: take the southwest corner of your state and draw a square, expanding it until you reach a district size of population. Then move east and keep doing it, and then shift the borders slightly if, at the end of the process, you have a narrow strip at the top of the state. Period.
the lines are already clearly established and it would not be any stretch to just say "these ZIP codes are your electoral base". although, i'm sure eventually Postmaster General would become a partisan cabinet position to make sure the ZIP code lines are "drawn correctly"....
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Could Ohio Kill the Electoral College?
05/11/2012 04:43:48 PM
- 704 Views
Well, let's hope Romney takes Pennsylvania, too, so we don't have to worry about this. *NM*
05/11/2012 05:46:22 PM
- 103 Views
I do not think even the GOPs massive PA vote suppression effort is enough to accomplish that.
05/11/2012 06:38:05 PM
- 376 Views
It's not impossible. I roughly reversed engineered Silver's tipping point simulation...
05/11/2012 11:06:16 PM
- 426 Views
what? directly vote for president? COMMUNISM!
05/11/2012 06:01:00 PM
- 281 Views
Seems like everything is communism these days, even/especially things that are not.
05/11/2012 06:56:55 PM
- 257 Views
A simple solution: proportional allocation of electors from each state with 15 votes or more.
05/11/2012 08:34:08 PM
- 268 Views
I prefer 1 EV per house district, with 2 EVs going to state winners
05/11/2012 08:40:50 PM
- 366 Views
it would certainly make the races more interesting.....
05/11/2012 09:09:24 PM
- 222 Views
If not for gerrymandering I would consider this the ideal solution.
05/11/2012 09:26:01 PM
- 241 Views
But in that system, the small states would be bypassed completely
05/11/2012 09:55:49 PM
- 275 Views
You mean even more than they already are (outside of the NH primaries)?
05/11/2012 11:17:14 PM
- 233 Views
Me too actually, but only with computerized semi-random redistricting *NM*
06/11/2012 05:38:25 AM
- 94 Views
why would there need to be a nation-wide recount? don't the states keep their own tallies?
05/11/2012 09:08:04 PM
- 270 Views
What if none of the states were close enough for a recount, but the country as a whole was?
05/11/2012 09:23:33 PM
- 231 Views
i suppose at that point the Supreme Court would have every justification to hear the case....
06/11/2012 06:07:06 PM
- 338 Views
What Legolas said; if we did it by national popular vote, recounts would need to be national.
05/11/2012 09:34:30 PM
- 331 Views
I like that idea, though I have long felt Larrys idea of using Congressional Districts is better.
05/11/2012 09:22:49 PM
- 393 Views
So you undermined your own argument from the start...
05/11/2012 10:01:07 PM
- 243 Views
i've always favored district lines by ZIP code myself
05/11/2012 10:05:59 PM
- 323 Views