SCOTUS ruled that Florida had to follow their own laws, that existed at the time of the election, not change them on the fly.
they ruled that florida should do a full recount, but that doing a full recount would harm the winner (bush), and they took their time to decide the case such that FL did not have time to do the full recount by the date the results needed to be certified.
it's still beside the fact that the FL supreme court should have been the deciding factor in the case, but now that it's history there is no point in arguing it anymore...
They anounced their decision in less than 24 hours so I don't know where you get "..they took their time to decide the case such that FL did not have time to do the full recount..." As for history you are correct; however, I would like to make 1 point. The non-binding recounts (using all the proposed methods) that occured after the election was certified STILL showed Bush as the winner. Only when you used some rather strange recount processes was Gore ever able to, barely, come out on top.
Important facts:
1: SCOTUS simply forced Florida to follow their own law.
2: SCOTUS Ruled that varying vote counting policies (in different counties) was not allowed.
3: Even after the various recounts, Bush still won the state.
SCOTUS Justice Antonin Scalia is brilliant, just brilliant - 
- 11/12/2012 05:09:19 AM
936 Views
- 11/12/2012 05:09:19 AM
936 Views
WTF does "I don’t care what their intent was. I care what it was that they intended" mean? 
- 11/12/2012 09:03:23 PM
506 Views
- 11/12/2012 09:03:23 PM
506 Views
Yeah I read that twice to see if that was right *NM*
- 11/12/2012 09:36:55 PM
247 Views
Part of me pities Scalias decline, because he could once nimbly and convincly argue black is white.
- 12/12/2012 07:09:56 PM
472 Views
Re: your post.
- 12/12/2012 07:18:18 PM
451 Views
More like disapeared in a puff of Florida's own law that they were trying to ignore.
- 12/12/2012 08:13:13 PM
472 Views
actually.....
- 12/12/2012 08:32:58 PM
555 Views
Re: actually.....
- 12/12/2012 09:39:01 PM
455 Views
Florida state law does not and did not prohibit statewide recounts.
- 16/12/2012 01:45:52 PM
473 Views
Spoken like a true lib.....I could have written that for you.
- 12/12/2012 05:08:42 AM
503 Views
The people of WA and CO just decided pot should be legal; think Scalia agrees?
- 12/12/2012 07:25:11 PM
487 Views
FreshMints decided that the almond aroma of radioactive arsenic is very pleasing...
- 12/12/2012 08:09:39 PM
513 Views
I am aware of Scalias "logic," and his rejection of it about a year later with Robamacare.
- 16/12/2012 01:51:16 PM
494 Views
But you didn't.
- 13/12/2012 04:06:05 PM
480 Views
Yup, yup; the Constitution is all about majority rule WITH minority rights.
- 16/12/2012 01:56:15 PM
413 Views
Your whole rant lacks any logic
- 12/12/2012 03:46:34 PM
511 Views
His comment references the authors (NOT words) intent in both negative and affirmative.
- 12/12/2012 06:45:02 PM
472 Views
I was stumped by his phrasing as well
- 12/12/2012 09:31:53 PM
367 Views
But we must go by his words and his understanding of their meaning, without interpretation. 
- 16/12/2012 01:40:23 PM
462 Views
- 16/12/2012 01:40:23 PM
462 Views
The SCotUS is no place for raging homophobes.
- 13/12/2012 04:48:30 AM
605 Views
Sorry you don't like it, but what he said is true.
- 13/12/2012 03:11:42 PM
531 Views
Lol. Homophobia is synonymous w/ homonegativism. It's not meant to convey a true phobia *NM*
- 13/12/2012 03:28:01 PM
312 Views
Only for people who don't know actually know how to read and understand words. Nice spin though. *NM*
- 13/12/2012 05:54:29 PM
190 Views
So then what we need is a definition of homophobia?
- 13/12/2012 09:56:15 PM
551 Views
Re: So then what we need is a definition of homophobia?
- 13/12/2012 11:16:46 PM
497 Views
-phobe : Greek -phobos, adj. derivative of phóbos fear, panic
- 13/12/2012 11:32:14 PM
506 Views
Do you have a similar problem with "xenophobia?" Because it's exactly the same thing.
- 14/12/2012 01:30:24 AM
436 Views
xenophobia is the fear of the alien... WTF are you trying to say?
- 14/12/2012 03:03:09 AM
500 Views
No. You are patently, objectively incorrect.
- 14/12/2012 08:39:00 AM
431 Views
Don't believe me, ask a Greek it is after all THEIR word. I gave you some extra capitals, happy now? *NM*
- 14/12/2012 02:56:09 PM
312 Views
stop being obtuse
- 14/12/2012 05:10:41 PM
478 Views
Hmmmm lets see, people misuse a word, perverting its meaning...
- 14/12/2012 07:29:11 PM
453 Views
If everyone "misuses" a word, that becomes an acceptable use of it.
- 14/12/2012 10:14:23 PM
466 Views
Re: If everyone "misuses" a word, that becomes an acceptable use of it.
- 15/12/2012 12:12:18 AM
485 Views
*NM*
and if everryone jumps off a cliff to splatter on the rocks I should just be a good little lemming.
- 15/12/2012 07:13:27 AM
385 Views
actually, you have already chosen stupid by pretending the word means something it does not
- 15/12/2012 03:34:35 PM
404 Views
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA, my friend John would strenuously disagree.
- 16/12/2012 06:50:19 AM
521 Views
and you are a small-minded buffoon who can't come up with real arguments so you resort to nitpicking
- 17/12/2012 11:48:25 PM
453 Views