Active Users:554 Time:04/04/2026 01:12:54 PM
Oh yeah, one of Bill Clinton's last acts as President Tom Send a noteboard - 23/12/2012 02:47:23 PM
I think the Glass-Steagall repeal may have magnified the scope, but the damage was done. It would have gone up again in 2000-2001 even without the repeal as the first round of securitizations was repackaged into CDOs, freeing up cash for the next round of mortgages. A securitization can take up to a year to consummate, and a CDO is typically 6 months from start to finish. You're looking at a speed bump there. There was another one a few years later for the same reason, though I suspect they did some sloppy securitizations with bad documents and compressed the time. It only takes forcing the lawyers to work 80-100 hour weeks three to four months of the year instead of two.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Community Reinvestment Act formally linked to the Sub-Prime/Mortgage Crisis - - 22/12/2012 09:01:56 PM 354 Views
Did you see the part of the graph where higher debt leveled off in '98 and stayed there 2 years? - 23/12/2012 04:13:01 AM 253 Views
Oh yeah, one of Bill Clinton's last acts as President - 23/12/2012 02:47:23 PM 156 Views
I've been trying to explain this to people for years. - 26/12/2012 02:54:04 PM 140 Views
You and most of the GOP, but the facts do not support that narrative. - 26/12/2012 05:54:28 PM 231 Views
CRA was a disaster for the nation.....go ahead, you can admit it. - 26/12/2012 08:32:33 PM 152 Views
The facts are in the graph in the article, and do not support that narrative. - 26/12/2012 08:44:23 PM 216 Views
The facts support it perfectly. You vs. reality is the problem here. *NM* - 26/12/2012 09:51:45 PM 54 Views
You, sir, have a richly developed sense of irony. - 26/12/2012 10:43:45 PM 208 Views

Reply to Message