The debate on comparative financial policies of the parties belongs elsewhere. lets keep on point.
HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 29/12/2012 04:15:13 PM
I have a bunch of issues with ever single politician who has ever drawn breath. HOWEVER, when it comes to financial issues the Democrat's track record is about as bad as it gets.
Name anything any Dem did comparable to Coolidge and Hoovers Great Depression under, Nixon and Fords Stagflation under or Bush 43s Great Recession.
Same old supply-side schtick: Spend a decade promising prosperity but digging an ever deeper hole with deregulation, a loose Fed and low taxes, then when it yields only double digit unemployment and a plummeting dollar blame Dems for not digging us out of the hole in half the time it took Republicans to put us there.
The Dems financial track record is ending the Depression in the '30s, stabilizing the dollar in the late '70s and presiding over the longest uninterrupted economic growth in US history in the '90s. The last GOP president I know of who did deliver at least one recession was Coolidge, because the disastrous Harding policies did not detonate until a few months after Hoover succeeded him.
Enough.
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/displayafact.cfm?Docid=200
http://www.dflorig.com/partycontrol.htm
compare the information contained on these 2 sites (remember to offset for election year vs financial year) and we can talk about it another day. I recommend using an excel spreadsheet as it will allow you to run calculations and compare them to the party that was in control at the time. I've already done so, but have no idea how I would send you a copy, but forming your own isn't hard. You can also look up when the various taxation changes (raising and lowering of rates)that have been done and see what the actual result was to the federal receipts. The evidence is rather overwhelming. However, a full discussion of this nature belongs elsewhere.
Community Reinvestment Act formally linked to the Sub-Prime/Mortgage Crisis - 
- 22/12/2012 09:01:56 PM
354 Views
- 22/12/2012 09:01:56 PM
354 Views
Did you see the part of the graph where higher debt leveled off in '98 and stayed there 2 years?
- 23/12/2012 04:13:01 AM
253 Views
Oh yeah, one of Bill Clinton's last acts as President
- 23/12/2012 02:47:23 PM
155 Views
... was signing a bill authored by three Republicans and passed with only ONE Dem Senators vote.
- 23/12/2012 11:37:10 PM
269 Views
Nice try - the repeal was all Clinton and Rubin.....buck stops with the leader.
- 24/12/2012 03:44:53 AM
138 Views
So the three Republicans who WROTE the bill are blameless; the guy who signed it is at fault.
- 24/12/2012 05:33:21 AM
255 Views
"Before you laugh too hard".....
- 24/12/2012 11:32:45 PM
232 Views
Also, did you just paraphrase Bill Clintons argument for Robamacare?! 
- 25/12/2012 03:36:37 AM
220 Views
- 25/12/2012 03:36:37 AM
220 Views
I've been trying to explain this to people for years.
- 26/12/2012 02:54:04 PM
140 Views
You and most of the GOP, but the facts do not support that narrative.
- 26/12/2012 05:54:28 PM
231 Views
Glass-Stegal was not repealed in a vacuum. There were many other regulatory changes
- 26/12/2012 07:40:45 PM
136 Views
I know the narrative; the facts still do not support it.
- 26/12/2012 08:43:25 PM
214 Views
Only when you ignore half of them.
- 27/12/2012 03:33:53 PM
123 Views
The entire "logic" ignores the most salient fact in the whole discussion.
- 28/12/2012 02:34:12 PM
225 Views
Your focus on that bill is the error.
- 28/12/2012 04:47:03 PM
242 Views
Any stats showing a disproportionate number of Fannie/Freddie defaults were by minorities?
- 28/12/2012 05:50:01 PM
245 Views
It has got NOTHING to do with skin color, the only color that should matter in banking is green.
- 28/12/2012 09:36:34 PM
152 Views
It should not, no, but the GOP dog whistles demonstrate it does.
- 28/12/2012 10:49:34 PM
130 Views
Get over YOUR perception that I give a damn about anyone's genetic background. I don't.
- 29/12/2012 04:18:22 PM
259 Views
Your incredible knowledge on this would fill a thimble. There were MULTIPLE issues>
- 28/12/2012 09:50:17 PM
273 Views
I love that part, too: "What Carter did in the '70s caused the subprime mortgage crisis in 2005."
- 28/12/2012 10:32:17 PM
129 Views
The policy began in the 70s, was MASIVELY expanded in the 90s, and blew up in the 00s.
- 29/12/2012 04:43:26 PM
234 Views
CRA was a disaster for the nation.....go ahead, you can admit it.
- 26/12/2012 08:32:33 PM
152 Views
The facts are in the graph in the article, and do not support that narrative.
- 26/12/2012 08:44:23 PM
215 Views
The facts support it perfectly. You vs. reality is the problem here. *NM*
- 26/12/2012 09:51:45 PM
54 Views
It is a pure causation line, get over it.
- 27/12/2012 03:35:19 PM
137 Views
Our Second Amendment discussions disqualify you as an authority on causality.
- 28/12/2012 02:58:04 PM
233 Views
I couldn't care less about party they both screwed up repeatedly.
- 28/12/2012 04:50:25 PM
112 Views
Then why do you insist on blaming Barney Frank exclusively?
- 28/12/2012 05:54:48 PM
233 Views
Because he is the person most responsible for forcing banks to lower lending standards. *NM*
- 28/12/2012 06:49:28 PM
129 Views
No he is not. It began in the 90s, well before he became chairman of the house commitee. *NM*
- 28/12/2012 09:57:02 PM
85 Views
Right, a guy who was only part of the House majority for two years did it all.
- 28/12/2012 11:03:08 PM
230 Views
I blame Barny for the under colateralization of F&F that he allowed and blocking the audit.
- 28/12/2012 09:54:27 PM
118 Views
Even were the charge valid (it is not,) if you believe it the crisis' main cause naught can help you
- 28/12/2012 11:00:14 PM
130 Views
The debate on comparative financial policies of the parties belongs elsewhere. lets keep on point.
- 29/12/2012 04:15:13 PM
131 Views