Active Users:413 Time:02/05/2025 07:37:41 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
This could mean great news for me personally Timthetrolloc Send a noteboard - 20/02/2013 09:50:39 PM
I work at a manufacturing plant that produces underground mining equipment mainly for Coal mining. We produce these Miners for mines all over the world and have seen a steep decline in coal production here in the United States over the last few years as prices for natural gas have gone down. More coal mining equals job stability for me! Hope this pans out for the environmental factors as well.
Reply to message
Coal - One of the Cleanest Energy Sources in the World! Anonymous2000 - 20/02/2013 09:41:02 PM 1188 Views
This could mean great news for me personally Timthetrolloc - 20/02/2013 09:50:39 PM 854 Views
I wonder if it could work on other fuels? Isaac - 20/02/2013 10:18:08 PM 873 Views
Uh, not quite... HyogaRott - 21/02/2013 02:45:03 AM 739 Views
Do we also need our oceans to be 30% more acidic? *NM* Roland00 - 21/02/2013 03:40:19 AM 475 Views
But the CO2 levels in our atmosphere are 20% higher than 50 years ago Floffe - 21/02/2013 08:49:29 AM 961 Views
There's a certain irony to being criticized on this one from that sector Isaac - 21/02/2013 05:37:37 PM 929 Views
aplogies HyogaRott - 21/02/2013 09:58:46 PM 793 Views
No problem *NM* Isaac - 21/02/2013 10:47:10 PM 366 Views
It seems pretty dubious. It still produces CO2. Ghavrel - 21/02/2013 10:02:55 AM 744 Views
i can think of three uses for excess CO2 moondog - 21/02/2013 03:16:42 PM 840 Views
Every single one of those increases atmospheric carbon. Ghavrel - 22/02/2013 12:39:00 AM 766 Views
The technology is still a big improvement over current methods. Aemon - 21/02/2013 05:01:31 PM 767 Views
Oh, I agree. My point is just that sequestration will remain an issue. *NM* Ghavrel - 22/02/2013 12:39:25 AM 355 Views
Well dense CO2 is easier to get rid of Isaac - 21/02/2013 06:08:33 PM 725 Views
Pretty sure putting it in the dirt would increase atmospheric levels, though. EDIT: Never mind. Ghavrel - 22/02/2013 12:40:38 AM 754 Views
Interesting. Bergioyn - 21/02/2013 09:57:27 AM 741 Views
Probably too little, too late. Dannymac - 21/02/2013 04:09:45 PM 834 Views
The excessive regulation is on coal use, not production. HyogaRott - 21/02/2013 05:00:28 PM 773 Views
Nope. Dannymac - 25/02/2013 05:26:39 AM 733 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes