Active Users:439 Time:17/06/2025 03:40:24 AM
The technology is still a big improvement over current methods. Aemon Send a noteboard - 21/02/2013 05:01:31 PM
We already do a lot of carbon capture / sequestration (generally it's put into big underground reservoirs), so this technology doesn't introduce a new problem. Obviously we can't shove tons of CO2 underground forever, but if we're going to do it in the short term, it's still better to do so cheaply and efficiently. And I mean really, all this has to do is get us by until fusion power becomes economical, and that shouldn't be too difficult. After all, fusion is only 20 years away. ;)
Reply to message
Coal - One of the Cleanest Energy Sources in the World! - 20/02/2013 09:41:02 PM 1215 Views
This could mean great news for me personally - 20/02/2013 09:50:39 PM 876 Views
I wonder if it could work on other fuels? - 20/02/2013 10:18:08 PM 897 Views
Uh, not quite... - 21/02/2013 02:45:03 AM 764 Views
Do we also need our oceans to be 30% more acidic? *NM* - 21/02/2013 03:40:19 AM 486 Views
There's a certain irony to being criticized on this one from that sector - 21/02/2013 05:37:37 PM 960 Views
aplogies - 21/02/2013 09:58:46 PM 820 Views
No problem *NM* - 21/02/2013 10:47:10 PM 379 Views
It seems pretty dubious. It still produces CO2. - 21/02/2013 10:02:55 AM 767 Views
i can think of three uses for excess CO2 - 21/02/2013 03:16:42 PM 866 Views
Every single one of those increases atmospheric carbon. - 22/02/2013 12:39:00 AM 796 Views
The technology is still a big improvement over current methods. - 21/02/2013 05:01:31 PM 846 Views
Interesting. - 21/02/2013 09:57:27 AM 777 Views
Probably too little, too late. - 21/02/2013 04:09:45 PM 861 Views
The excessive regulation is on coal use, not production. - 21/02/2013 05:00:28 PM 801 Views
Nope. - 25/02/2013 05:26:39 AM 760 Views

Reply to Message