Active Users:333 Time:12/07/2025 03:14:00 AM
You sound like Voldemort lol Nighthawk Send a noteboard - 26/02/2013 01:28:40 PM

As though aging and dying is a shameful thing. We must do anything and everything to avoid that fate, eh? In all seriousness, how long we can live is not the relevant question. The relevant question is, how long can we live well? I rather die at 80, with my full faculties, than die at 120, being fed and taken care of for 10+ miserable years.

Reply to message
Scientists claim 72 is the new 30 - 26/02/2013 03:06:04 AM 917 Views
"New" is a relative term, as its usage here demonstrates. - 26/02/2013 04:31:24 AM 428 Views
Re: "New" is a relative term, as its usage here demonstrates. - 26/02/2013 08:28:58 AM 373 Views
Perhaps quality of life is the basic moral issue here. - 28/02/2013 08:16:48 PM 324 Views
I don't see why it would be immoral, but I can see why it would be undesirable - 26/02/2013 04:59:32 AM 380 Views
Stole my answer . . . - 26/02/2013 01:20:33 PM 312 Views
It comes down to the same thing - 26/02/2013 05:10:14 PM 344 Views
You sound like Voldemort lol - 26/02/2013 01:28:40 PM 423 Views
I haven't read Harry Potter so I'll take your word for it - 26/02/2013 03:13:55 PM 325 Views
Solution: Only live to 110. No miserable last 10 years. *NM* - 26/02/2013 08:18:41 PM 225 Views

Reply to Message