Active Users:366 Time:11/07/2025 10:02:43 PM
Solution: Only live to 110. No miserable last 10 years. *NM* Bergioyn Send a noteboard - 26/02/2013 08:18:41 PM

View original post
As though aging and dying is a shameful thing. We must do anything and everything to avoid that fate, eh? In all seriousness, how long we can live is not the relevant question. The relevant question is, how long can we live well? I rather die at 80, with my full faculties, than die at 120, being fed and taken care of for 10+ miserable years.

Tia mi aven Moridin isainde vadin

Lord Bergioyn of House Jaederan, Baron of Tridea, Pro Tempore Emeritus of the Landsraad, CHOAM Senior Director of Interplanetary Trade

6-7-0 + 1 + 2-0-0
Reply to message
Scientists claim 72 is the new 30 - 26/02/2013 03:06:04 AM 915 Views
"New" is a relative term, as its usage here demonstrates. - 26/02/2013 04:31:24 AM 426 Views
Re: "New" is a relative term, as its usage here demonstrates. - 26/02/2013 08:28:58 AM 370 Views
Perhaps quality of life is the basic moral issue here. - 28/02/2013 08:16:48 PM 321 Views
I don't see why it would be immoral, but I can see why it would be undesirable - 26/02/2013 04:59:32 AM 378 Views
Stole my answer . . . - 26/02/2013 01:20:33 PM 309 Views
It comes down to the same thing - 26/02/2013 05:10:14 PM 341 Views
You sound like Voldemort lol - 26/02/2013 01:28:40 PM 420 Views
I haven't read Harry Potter so I'll take your word for it - 26/02/2013 03:13:55 PM 322 Views
Solution: Only live to 110. No miserable last 10 years. *NM* - 26/02/2013 08:18:41 PM 225 Views

Reply to Message