Active Users:696 Time:17/09/2026 08:28:38 AM
Definitely, but you still get a high civilian body toll Isaac Send a noteboard - 10/03/2013 08:14:26 PM

View original postAlong with the US. It's easy to fire repeatedly at civilian targets when you yourself aren't being targeted with a massive and disproportionate counterstrike.

The problem with artillery, and that was my original assignment in the service, is that in modern doctrine you either have a fixed position you've fortified like crazy or you have self-propelled guns, because you can't hide artillery pieces once they start shooting. A SP battery fires a a few volleys then dashes off somewhere else, rinse repeat. A fortified position you pretty much have to take out with a precision strike or direct attack because normal shells pick up about five feet of inaccuracy for every second of flight time. Most have a kill radius that makes that irrelevant against infantry but you really need to shell the fuck out of a fortified position to ensure one of the rounds lands in a place that will damage the gun or kill the crews or set off the ammo etc.

Don't get me wrong, it's a foregone conclusion who wins and the troop casualties rates for our side will be small compared to theirs but that artillery is not something we can easily neutralize in the opening hours of a conflict and that's the period when civilian casualties would be easiest to rack up.


View original postSend the residents of Seoul into shelters, grab your balls and blow the living shit out of North Korea.

Personally I basically agree. Coordinate a preemptive strike with nothing but the troops and readiness we can get going with a minimum risk of giving it away and just hit them first. Time it when everyone is awake and give the shelter/evac order at the last moment, maybe 20-30 minutes before actual fire begins at the soonest. As I said originally, I think we're delaying the inevitable and every year raises the cost.

The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
This message last edited by Isaac on 10/03/2013 at 08:19:27 PM
Reply to message
North Korea Withdraws from Korean War Armistice - 08/03/2013 10:39:44 PM 1699 Views
Again? Didn't they "tear up the armistice" a few years ago? - 08/03/2013 10:49:59 PM 921 Views
They said they were "no longer obligated" after the second nuke test, and would resist attacks. - 09/03/2013 10:16:17 PM 1039 Views
Not to diminish the role of China in this but you're bypassing the actual issue - 09/03/2013 11:26:18 PM 972 Views
I would like it noted I responded to you before you responded to me. - 09/03/2013 11:40:18 PM 1063 Views
Duly noted - 10/03/2013 01:03:59 AM 1018 Views
Re: Duly noted - 11/03/2013 06:14:59 PM 985 Views
Re: Duly noted - 11/03/2013 07:05:17 PM 1004 Views
Re: Duly noted - 11/03/2013 10:34:36 PM 918 Views
Re: Duly noted - 12/03/2013 02:04:05 AM 991 Views
One word: evacuation. - 10/03/2013 03:22:42 AM 920 Views
Time constraints - 10/03/2013 04:37:51 AM 1057 Views
NK artillery myth - 10/03/2013 03:59:36 PM 1065 Views
Seoul isn't the only urban location, refering to it simply saves time - 10/03/2013 04:38:40 PM 998 Views
Well, but one would assume that after an initial salvo the South Koreans would counterstrike. - 10/03/2013 06:51:34 PM 969 Views
Definitely, but you still get a high civilian body toll - 10/03/2013 08:14:26 PM 972 Views
I would love to have a solid excuse for us to crush them like a bug. - 08/03/2013 11:54:22 PM 976 Views
It really is a pity that N. Korea isn't located in remote Siberia. - 09/03/2013 06:09:44 AM 887 Views
This. Sadly. - 09/03/2013 04:38:13 PM 905 Views

Reply to Message