I wonder which other Constitutional rights should require a background check to excercise? *NM*
HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 22/04/2013 08:56:15 PM
View original post
It is possible to support background checks and limitations on magazine capacity, and still support the right to bear arms. Just sayin'
It is possible to support background checks and limitations on magazine capacity, and still support the right to bear arms. Just sayin'
Just to be clear...
20/04/2013 03:32:07 AM
- 1061 Views
Of course it is
20/04/2013 04:18:27 AM
- 491 Views
But, they is us
23/04/2013 03:13:27 AM
- 651 Views
First of all, I don't believe that 90% of the population support it
23/04/2013 04:55:02 AM
- 685 Views
Just to be clear it is possible to support freedom of the press &support censorship of the internet
20/04/2013 05:03:26 AM
- 605 Views
Well played
23/04/2013 03:20:34 AM
- 745 Views
No you really can't
23/04/2013 05:59:04 PM
- 643 Views
That's the most amusingly incomprehensible attempt at constitutional analysis I've read in a while. *NM*
26/04/2013 10:47:18 AM
- 258 Views
How so? It made sense to me
26/04/2013 03:10:11 PM
- 488 Views
Presumption of innocence isn't part of the constitution.
26/04/2013 09:30:17 PM
- 522 Views
I think that's being a bit pedantic, to be kind
26/04/2013 11:13:33 PM
- 732 Views
I am not trying to pick a fight with you or anyone else. I'm very curious.
29/04/2013 02:34:19 PM
- 541 Views
about 90% of the country agrees with that but still Obama can't close the deal.
21/04/2013 04:24:15 PM
- 715 Views
the fact that 90% support it should be obvious that most see it as *a* solution
22/04/2013 05:32:42 PM
- 505 Views
the fact that Obama can get a bil through the senate when it has 90% support show a fialure ot lead
23/04/2013 04:29:07 AM
- 602 Views
the fact that Obama can get a bil through the senate when it has 90% support show a fialure ot lead
23/04/2013 04:29:13 AM
- 604 Views
Yep
23/04/2013 03:47:12 AM
- 722 Views
90% also believes constanly blaiming others for your own failure is a sign of weakness
23/04/2013 04:55:53 AM
- 601 Views
You're smarter than this
23/04/2013 06:41:09 AM
- 503 Views
but is wasn't heavily favored it just polls well
24/04/2013 05:56:41 PM
- 598 Views
..and that is where the misinformation comes into play
24/04/2013 07:35:51 PM
- 552 Views
And that reply makes my point
26/04/2013 05:49:53 PM
- 630 Views
The point is that background checks already exist on every commercial firearm transaction.
27/04/2013 05:16:41 AM
- 651 Views
but we all know there is no correlation between having a gun and shooting someone with it
22/04/2013 05:30:12 PM
- 592 Views
I wonder which other Constitutional rights should require a background check to excercise? *NM*
22/04/2013 08:56:15 PM
- 227 Views
How about just the ones that can have potentially lethal consequences for other citizens?
23/04/2013 03:56:25 AM
- 617 Views
Just to be clear: another hypocrisy of the right wing
04/05/2013 06:37:31 PM
- 726 Views
When posting into dead threads it helps to A) Be on topic or B) Make intelligent points
04/05/2013 08:08:46 PM
- 4784 Views