Active Users:356 Time:09/05/2025 05:12:03 PM
I tend to agree, though some say that just prevented a threepeat (Note:No one in Green Bay does. ) Joel Send a noteboard - 01/10/2009 06:41:12 AM

that they wouldn't have won those Super Bowls. That loss was just embarassing, and it seems like it changed the whole team's attitude.

Any way you cut it, the 97 Super Bowl was one of the most exciting I've ever seen. Sure, the last couple games have been great, but I had no emotional attachments to any of the teams. So for my money that 97 was the best Super Bowl of my life time.

Yup, sometimes teams need to have a game like that for a reality check. I mean, they were coming off a bye facing a second year expansion team, but they didn't just lose, they got THUMPED in front of their own crowd. I think something similar happened with the Giants a couple years ago; if they hadn't had to play an extra game, then win at Dallas and Lambeau (in January, something no one else has ever done) I don't think they'd have been playing at the level needed to beat the Pats. That one and the '97 game were easily the best Super Bowls of my 35 year old memory, not the annihilations so common, but a true slug fest from start to finish between two great teams. I put them right up there with Super Bowls V and X.
The win may not have been as big as the Sox in 04, but it was still huge. Great summary. :)

Thanks, and it was kinda like that, too. As I saw someone else point out while digging all that stuff up, in an era where the AFC has been so dominant younger folks tend to forget that until 1997 the NFC OWNED the Super Bowl. When Denver won as a wildcard they were the first wildcard Champ since the 1980 Raiders--and the first AFC winner since the '82 Raiders; those were the only AFC victories between the Steel Curtains last and Denvers first. In '97 I personally was coming off two straight seasons where I'd picked the Super Bowl Champ in preseason (actually, after the previous NFC Championship; I knew the Cowboys would be out for blood after SF stopped their threepeat, and knew they wouldn't be able to stop the Pack after the last gasp of their dynasty beat them for a trip to SB XXX. ) So when I looked around and Denver seemed the best team I thought, Well, the AFC hasn't won in 15 years; I guess this will be a real test.... Sadly, my streak was stopped by the Oilers in '99 (as a native Houstonian I really did know better, should've expected they'd pull the crap they did in the Super Bowl, but I couldn't help myself. :disapprove: )
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
The '97-'98 Broncos Still Blow My Mind. (THIS ONE'S FOR FLOFFE!11! ) - 30/09/2009 08:41:01 PM 898 Views
Impressive post - 30/09/2009 09:17:23 PM 476 Views
Just watch the videos; they largely speak for themselves. - 30/09/2009 09:32:25 PM 569 Views
that hit on okoye was always listed as the turning point in his career - 30/09/2009 10:32:35 PM 438 Views
Guess I just missed it. - 30/09/2009 10:52:35 PM 480 Views
there *were* injuries, but he was never the same after that hit - 01/10/2009 02:01:13 AM 430 Views
Sorry, still chinese to me. - 01/10/2009 11:30:42 AM 448 Views
Oh, c'mon, man! - 02/10/2009 01:52:07 AM 448 Views
Well.. - 02/10/2009 10:55:29 AM 558 Views
OK: - 02/10/2009 11:23:33 AM 692 Views
They Stink! *NM* - 30/09/2009 10:16:24 PM 197 Views
You're thinking of the '97 Packers... - 30/09/2009 10:17:41 PM 455 Views
broncos are better than packers? who is the trophy named after again? *NM* - 30/09/2009 10:27:15 PM 220 Views
Don't remind me of that travesty. - 30/09/2009 10:51:37 PM 459 Views
NFC trophy is named after halas - 01/10/2009 02:06:24 AM 470 Views
I know, I know, and it irks me every year. - 01/10/2009 06:14:49 AM 513 Views
<mock> Religion? Really? </mock> *NM* - 30/09/2009 10:38:58 PM 306 Views
It was that or "History. " - 30/09/2009 10:55:55 PM 472 Views
I've always thought if it wasn't for that crushing loss to Jacksonville in 96.... - 01/10/2009 02:35:00 AM 411 Views
I tend to agree, though some say that just prevented a threepeat (Note:No one in Green Bay does. ) - 01/10/2009 06:41:12 AM 615 Views
I've heard the same thing - 01/10/2009 10:32:57 AM 489 Views
Possible, though I don't think Elway would give up that easily. - 02/10/2009 01:54:04 AM 440 Views
The '85 Bears would beat them by two touchdowns. *NM* - 01/10/2009 03:26:12 AM 343 Views
Reckon we'll never know, but I frankly doubt it. - 01/10/2009 06:11:27 AM 547 Views
One small correction... - 01/10/2009 06:20:56 PM 491 Views
My bad, thought I'd gone for the season. - 01/10/2009 07:44:51 PM 501 Views
Defensive pressure trumps absolutely everything else in football. '85 Bears were the kings. - 01/10/2009 09:37:37 PM 427 Views
I disagree with that statement as well as many of your others. - 02/10/2009 12:43:33 AM 540 Views
Have a look at the teams to win the SB since '80 and then we'll talk. - 02/10/2009 02:54:48 AM 435 Views
I referenced teams that have won since the '80s, as well as one from before then. - 02/10/2009 03:53:47 AM 617 Views
You sound more and more ridiculous with each new post. - 03/10/2009 03:48:09 AM 448 Views
Just because you ignore something doesn't mean it's absent. - 04/10/2009 05:23:53 PM 598 Views
u win!!1! - 05/10/2009 07:02:44 AM 470 Views
Too bad they cheated to win.....yeah, heart..... - 01/10/2009 04:07:02 AM 451 Views
I hate to tell Broncos' fans... - 01/10/2009 04:08:00 PM 522 Views
HA! HA! HA! How soon they forget.....nice one! *NM* - 01/10/2009 04:15:57 PM 209 Views
I actually think Cutler got a raw deal out of that one. - 01/10/2009 07:55:32 PM 484 Views
Okay, I just watched all of those videos... - 02/10/2009 01:00:20 PM 563 Views
Re: Okay, I just watched all of those videos... - 04/10/2009 05:52:37 PM 559 Views

Reply to Message