Active Users:688 Time:29/10/2026 04:43:28 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I dont really think it takes much care Urza Send a noteboard - 06/06/2013 05:08:38 PM

View original post
View original postIts not invasive and it catches rapists and murderers. Where is the potential for abuse or harm here?

What happens to DNA samples for people that are later acquitted?

And why do you suddenly trust the government to properly care for / manage DNA samples when you don't trust it to do a single, solitary, good god-damn thing ELSE properly?


Again, the balance has to be against potential harm or abuse. I'm asking what that is quite openly cause I don't see it. I consider the size and extent of the government to be quite absurd but catching rapists and murderers falls pretty squarely within their legitimate domain. Tell me what potential for harm or abuse exists here? How is this different from finger printing?

Reply to message
SCOTUS - Give the police your DNA! Anonymous2000 - 03/06/2013 08:31:27 PM 1152 Views
Good for Scalia. And the other three, of course. Ghavrel - 03/06/2013 11:54:30 PM 801 Views
Breyer must have bumped his head the morning they wrote the decison! *NM* Anonymous2000 - 04/06/2013 01:20:23 AM 306 Views
Why? Urza - 04/06/2013 08:50:19 AM 855 Views
Because it's a search which should be protected under the 4th Amendment. Ghavrel - 04/06/2013 03:38:18 PM 810 Views
Why? Jeordam - 04/06/2013 09:05:27 PM 827 Views
Excepting fingerprints, those things are in plain sight, so not protected by the Fourth Amendment. Joel - 10/08/2013 10:36:08 AM 706 Views
Well no... Urza - 06/06/2013 05:13:43 PM 793 Views
Re: Why? Macharius - 04/06/2013 09:55:38 PM 943 Views
I dont really think it takes much care Urza - 06/06/2013 05:08:38 PM 867 Views
It isn't the immediate harm, but the potential for abuse. HyogaRott - 06/06/2013 06:17:58 PM 802 Views
The harm is to presumption of innocence, by conviction through illegally obtained evidence. Joel - 10/08/2013 11:07:59 AM 842 Views
Re: Why? imlad - 11/06/2013 07:43:07 PM 786 Views
Don't know why it matters. DNA is on file. So what? Rape anybody lately? *NM* Nighthawk - 04/06/2013 04:09:08 AM 349 Views
Hey man, with your DNA, the government can clone you man..... Anonymous2000 - 04/06/2013 01:03:34 PM 739 Views
I don't have any issue with the decision; however, the possibility of abuse should be watched. HyogaRott - 04/06/2013 03:11:02 PM 771 Views
I'm a lefty, and I LIKE this decision imlad - 11/06/2013 07:35:17 PM 794 Views
The contents of our homes are protected, but not the contents of our bodies? Joel - 10/08/2013 10:40:17 AM 740 Views
Scariest thing: I agreed with Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Dick Cheney in the same WEEK. Joel - 10/08/2013 10:44:50 AM 708 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes