And to answer urzas question, yes, I do object equally to taking fingerprints or DNA from SUSPECTS. Convict them of a crime and it is a different story, since convicted criminals do lose some (though not all) rights, but until/unless convicted of something via LEGALLY obtained evidence there is this thing called "presumption of innocence" that prohibits fishing trips. I mean, Hell, why not just arrest everyone for suspicion of anything now, take their DNA, release them if "proven innocent," and then have the whole countrys DNA on file. Henceforth police will be able to solve any and all crimes if they can just find some of the perpetrators DNA, because they can instantly match it with the database. I feel safer already.