Active Users:328 Time:15/05/2024 03:53:22 PM
I tend to agree with your conclusions, but not for the myopic reasons you cite. Tom Send a noteboard - 01/12/2013 05:58:55 PM

Most of the Republicans you mentioned are absolute jokes and lightweights (like Kasich, Haley, Perry, Jindal and most of the other governors you mentioned) or come with tons of baggage (Cruz, Bush, Rubio, Paul). I think that Christie is going to have a rough primary season because so many Republicans still don't seem to get that even making a candidate run to the right for the primaries can fatally compromise his chances of victory in the general election. I still think Christie will win if he runs, but there is a lot that can happen between now and then (he could have a heart attack, for example) so trying to pick a candidate before the midterms before that election is sort of quixotic at best.

On the Democratic side, I do think that it's Hillary's race to lose, but again, there is a lot that can happen between now and then. We should not underestimate the frenemy relationship that the Clintons have with the administration, and there are certainly subtle ways that Obama could undermine a Hillary candidacy if the Clintons continue to pick away at Obama for the good of the party as they've started to. Cuomo would have a good chance of winning but he's very inexperienced, something that should make people stop and reflect given what Obama has shown us. The candidate that I find most interesting is Cory Booker, who could repeat Obama's path to Hillary's detriment if he wanted to. Of course, he's light on experience, too, though he has more executive experience than Obama had coming in (which was none, of course). Warren will likely also make a strong play for the left wing of the party.

If Republicans wise up and stop pushing loud ideologues and focus instead on capable statesmen, then I think the party can win big in 2014 and move on to take the White House. If the Tea Party continues to influence the Republicans, or worse yet, convinces the rank and file that their previous candidates were "moderates" and that hard core conservatives are needed, we will see a Democratic Party that continues on despite its obvious flaws because the alternative looks crazy, belligerent and stupid.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Christie vs. Clinton - 2016! - 01/12/2013 02:12:40 AM 689 Views
Re: Christie vs. Clinton - 2016! - 01/12/2013 04:12:59 PM 417 Views
I tend to agree with your conclusions, but not for the myopic reasons you cite. - 01/12/2013 05:58:55 PM 393 Views
No Huntsman Jr? *NM* - 01/12/2013 11:46:49 PM 154 Views
How are those reasons short-sighted? They're basic tactics - 02/12/2013 09:05:45 AM 412 Views
You misunderstand me - 02/12/2013 02:26:56 PM 373 Views
Okay that's clearer - 02/12/2013 03:24:46 PM 375 Views
He needs to be careful about peaking too soon. - 01/12/2013 06:55:52 PM 341 Views
It's easy to make the Guiliani comparison, but remember..... - 01/12/2013 08:19:38 PM 393 Views
Giuliani's problem wasn't that he peaked too soon - 02/12/2013 02:37:58 PM 349 Views
Re: Christie vs. Clinton - 2016! - 01/12/2013 11:45:42 PM 513 Views
Understood.....but too bad on Jeb. - 02/12/2013 02:57:04 AM 330 Views
He will be another Romney. - 02/12/2013 12:41:23 PM 409 Views
I certainly hope not - 02/12/2013 03:22:17 PM 397 Views
I don't think Christie will run and I don't think he wins if he does - 09/12/2013 01:37:03 AM 338 Views

Reply to Message