View original post
If you just run the same calculation on the moon, its width compared to distance is indeed somewhat less than that still. So should be accurate.
If you just run the same calculation on the moon, its width compared to distance is indeed somewhat less than that still. So should be accurate.
An eight hundred mile radius would make the city much bigger than France, though.
You're right, France is more like an 800 mile diameter, not radius (or at least, France is about an 800 mile width). I think I realized that at some point, but then forgot. My city is more like a 600 mile radius to most points, 800 to the farthest points. So definitely bigger than France. I might scale that down a bit, but not too much.
And yeah, the calculation does work for the moon, so I suppose I should trust it. It seems so strange, but it must be correct.
Warder to starry_nite
Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Maths! And whether or not I am applying them correctly to a ridiculous fantasy situation.
- 01/08/2014 06:39:38 PM
1041 Views
You didn't even spell it right.
- 01/08/2014 07:38:12 PM
788 Views
There's a simple way of testing that, I figure.
- 01/08/2014 11:05:38 PM
851 Views
Re: There's a simple way of testing that, I figure.
- 01/08/2014 11:38:28 PM
1029 Views
Would a thing 10 miles wide look bigger from 800 miles than a thing 2000 miles wide from 230,000?
- 02/08/2014 05:38:15 AM
955 Views
Re: Would a thing 10 miles wide look bigger from 800 miles than a thing 2000 miles ...
- 05/08/2014 05:14:08 AM
824 Views
I come bearing gifts of knowledge
- 02/08/2014 07:54:07 PM
1228 Views
Air quality would affect visibility anyway, and you have to calculate curvature of the Earth.
- 03/08/2014 03:18:42 AM
765 Views
Re: Air quality would affect visibility anyway, and you have to calculate curvature of the Earth.
- 05/08/2014 05:09:48 AM
1063 Views