Active Users:892 Time:16/09/2026 05:27:39 AM
I mean, ignoring everything else, I always thought it boiled down to an easily-answered question beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 17/09/2014 04:45:02 PM

"Do you think that over a century of discharging tons of smoke into the atmosphere has had, or will have, any effect?"

I mean, there's stuff in smoke, and it doesn't just float into space to turn into stars.

It's very easy to get bogged down in arguments about which SPECIFIC chemicals are causing which specific problems, and what specific effects that is having on the world as a whole.

But my thinking is, simply, it seems intuitive that SOMETHING results from pollution. If you pollute a river, the water is contaminated. If you have a landfill, that's ground full of trash. If I see a picture of a Chinese city covered in smog, the stuff in the air doesn't just wink out of existence when a breeze comes to blow it away. I don't need to debate about the consistency and cause of acid rain when it's obvious that acid rain exists.



I amuse myself.
Reply to message
The "settled science" of climate change continues to unravel..... - 16/09/2014 07:00:16 PM 1501 Views
What utter rubbish - 16/09/2014 08:54:22 PM 1093 Views
By the time my daughter is 50'ish..... - 17/09/2014 04:08:35 AM 1076 Views
tell the people of norfolk, VA that climate change isn't happening - 18/09/2014 12:12:45 AM 1284 Views
So if we are the only deniers I expect to see rapid and dramatic decrease in the carbon? - 17/09/2014 08:39:30 PM 1119 Views
The Chinese will take action - they have not much choice anymore. - 17/09/2014 09:51:10 PM 1100 Views
Reducing pollution doesn't exactly mean cutting CO2..... - 18/09/2014 04:09:58 AM 1046 Views
don't consufe glaobal warming with air pollution - 18/09/2014 03:45:53 PM 1085 Views
I don't know anyone that would call me right wing - 27/09/2014 05:15:21 AM 1371 Views
I mean, ignoring everything else, I always thought it boiled down to an easily-answered question - 17/09/2014 04:45:02 PM 1110 Views
If by "unravel" you mean that it's more complex than it seemed at first, then yes. - 17/09/2014 08:04:24 PM 1091 Views
The probelm is the models suck and they are beingt over sold - 17/09/2014 08:43:56 PM 1079 Views
They're flawed, sure, but they're the best we have. - 17/09/2014 09:46:34 PM 1156 Views
It isn't "any flaw in model" they are almost all wrong and most but a huge margin - 18/09/2014 03:50:49 PM 1065 Views
the problem is that people like yourself refuse to believe that science works - 17/09/2014 11:57:11 PM 1137 Views
that was 90% inaccurate - 18/09/2014 03:39:35 PM 1112 Views
"More complex" is a coward's way of saying we were wrong..... - 18/09/2014 04:22:00 AM 1059 Views
If by coward you mean scientist, then sure. - 18/09/2014 06:10:30 AM 1135 Views

Reply to Message