Active Users:1970 Time:08/05/2026 10:06:50 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Reducing pollution doesn't exactly mean cutting CO2..... Anonymous2000 Send a noteboard - 18/09/2014 04:09:58 AM

The pollution in China is due to soot and sulfur. I believe you can reduce these without reducing CO2 by the same amount.


View original post
View original postI mean if the whole word has agreed then we should expect to see changes happen right away. How much is China going to decrease their output by this decade?


View original postNot because of global warming but because the smog is killing them, and doing more to antagonize their population than anything else.


View original postThat said, with China's growth numbers, progress for them would really just be to come close to stabilizing CO2 emissions, decreasing them is asking a lot.

Reply to message
The "settled science" of climate change continues to unravel..... Anonymous2000 - 16/09/2014 07:00:16 PM 1423 Views
What utter rubbish ironclad - 16/09/2014 08:54:22 PM 1035 Views
By the time my daughter is 50'ish..... Anonymous2000 - 17/09/2014 04:08:35 AM 1014 Views
tell the people of norfolk, VA that climate change isn't happening moondog - 18/09/2014 12:12:45 AM 1216 Views
So if we are the only deniers I expect to see rapid and dramatic decrease in the carbon? random thoughts - 17/09/2014 08:39:30 PM 1052 Views
The Chinese will take action - they have not much choice anymore. Legolas - 17/09/2014 09:51:10 PM 1035 Views
Reducing pollution doesn't exactly mean cutting CO2..... Anonymous2000 - 18/09/2014 04:09:58 AM 978 Views
don't consufe glaobal warming with air pollution random thoughts - 18/09/2014 03:45:53 PM 1017 Views
I don't know anyone that would call me right wing callandor1000 - 27/09/2014 05:15:21 AM 1305 Views
I mean, ignoring everything else, I always thought it boiled down to an easily-answered question beetnemesis - 17/09/2014 04:45:02 PM 1051 Views
If by "unravel" you mean that it's more complex than it seemed at first, then yes. Legolas - 17/09/2014 08:04:24 PM 1021 Views
The probelm is the models suck and they are beingt over sold random thoughts - 17/09/2014 08:43:56 PM 1002 Views
They're flawed, sure, but they're the best we have. Legolas - 17/09/2014 09:46:34 PM 1087 Views
It isn't "any flaw in model" they are almost all wrong and most but a huge margin random thoughts - 18/09/2014 03:50:49 PM 1001 Views
the problem is that people like yourself refuse to believe that science works moondog - 17/09/2014 11:57:11 PM 1067 Views
that was 90% inaccurate random thoughts - 18/09/2014 03:39:35 PM 1044 Views
"More complex" is a coward's way of saying we were wrong..... Anonymous2000 - 18/09/2014 04:22:00 AM 996 Views
If by coward you mean scientist, then sure. Legolas - 18/09/2014 06:10:30 AM 1078 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes