Active Users:777 Time:10/09/2026 04:21:17 AM
he was not choked to death and he was not choked for selling cigerettes random thoughts Send a noteboard - 04/12/2014 02:28:44 PM

He was saying "I can't breath" said it seven or eight times. If you are talking you are breathing, they go hand in hand. The corner say the choke hold was a factor but so was the person kneeling on his back (chest compression) and so was his heart condition. The police did not take him to ground for selling smokes, he was taken to ground because he resisted arrest.

Choke holds are against policy (not the same as being illegal) and the officer should be punished for using it but I have seen no evidence that he intended to harm much less kill Garner. As in most cases where people are injured fighting the police Garner takes some measure of fault for what happened to him. He was very large man and did not go down easy. They could have tased him but with his bad heart the results may have been the same.

We do need to have a discussion about police and community interaction but part of that discussion needs to "if you fight the cops and get hurt is your dumbass fault" and we need to avoid such hyperbole as "black man chocked to death for selling cigerettes"

Reply to message
New York cop pushes black man's face into pavement and chokes him to death for selling cigerettes - 04/12/2014 12:03:54 AM 1554 Views
What does his color have to do with anything? - 04/12/2014 07:37:08 AM 1022 Views
A short answer for your long post - 04/12/2014 04:43:12 PM 890 Views
123 blacks shot to death by cops in 2012; 326 whites. - 05/12/2014 12:40:56 AM 1003 Views
These numbers make me angry. - 05/12/2014 05:39:26 AM 854 Views
I hate these stats, so misleading. Only 13% of the US population is black! - 05/12/2014 02:02:18 PM 1046 Views
"Proportions, man." - 05/12/2014 02:28:23 PM 821 Views
math is hard - 05/12/2014 02:45:08 PM 909 Views
It doesn't matter why. - 05/12/2014 03:19:54 PM 1051 Views
it does to me. - 05/12/2014 03:52:01 PM 877 Views
Dangerous territories when you talk socioeconomics - 05/12/2014 04:08:57 PM 817 Views
Danger is my middle name. *NM* - 05/12/2014 04:47:23 PM 451 Views
But that's a completely separate issue than the one that the post is talking about. - 05/12/2014 05:12:44 PM 1022 Views
Heh, yes. Because none of us ever adds layers to these posts. Ever. - 05/12/2014 07:34:04 PM 919 Views
That is SUCH A BAD SENTENCE. - 05/12/2014 08:07:18 PM 887 Views
I'm not Tom - 05/12/2014 10:13:43 PM 827 Views
Thus spake Patsy Stone! - 05/12/2014 10:15:44 PM 835 Views
Sweetie Darling - 05/12/2014 10:16:34 PM 714 Views
Okay. I can agree that we do go on tangents. - 05/12/2014 10:23:21 PM 1166 Views
Re: "Proportions, man." - 05/12/2014 03:34:16 PM 1100 Views
So what you have implied here then is that - 05/12/2014 04:05:10 PM 879 Views
That's a fair assumption to make *shrug* *NM* - 07/12/2014 05:35:59 PM 570 Views
And now you're the one doing exactly what you implied Cannoli was doing. - 05/12/2014 05:17:25 PM 823 Views
...I'm doing no such thing. - 07/12/2014 05:27:13 PM 978 Views
L-Dog is right, you are wrong, look at the proportion of crimes committed..... - 05/12/2014 06:30:29 PM 878 Views
Erm, no. - 07/12/2014 05:34:38 PM 1084 Views
Unbelievable. I have no words... *NM* - 04/12/2014 10:15:32 AM 661 Views
he was not choked to death and he was not choked for selling cigerettes - 04/12/2014 02:28:44 PM 847 Views
I mean, "Killed him without intent" is pretty much the definition of manslaughter, isn't it? *NM* - 04/12/2014 04:44:18 PM 462 Views
sorry but it isn't - 04/12/2014 05:54:27 PM 794 Views
did you actually watch the video of his death? - 04/12/2014 06:30:26 PM 893 Views
OK watched it all the way. Which one of my conclusions were suppossed to change? - 04/12/2014 07:39:07 PM 756 Views
sorry, i mistook you for a human capable of compassion. my mistake - 04/12/2014 07:47:35 PM 824 Views
Don't worry I don't mistaake you for someone capable of rational thought - 04/12/2014 10:56:44 PM 751 Views

Reply to Message