View original postThat is just it though: You did NOT criticize them; you excused them as mere "idiot stormtroopers... following orders." That just passes the buck, which may be bureaucracies PURPOSE to some degree, but remains inexcusable. The mayor and other city executives are responsible to the extent Garners death was the result of their policies, orders and officers (hence the suit and settlement) but the officers SHARE that responsibility for directly causing his death, whether or not by following city policy. If the policy were "shoot all infants on sight," that would be a reprehensible policy whose authors were equally reprehensible, but it would still be up to individual officers whether to COMPLY, and those who did would be no less reprehensible.
But that's people being bad. Everyone knows it's bad. The problem we should be concerned with is bad policies, which are something we can and should do something about. People taking unwarranted license which they are permitted by law is not so much of a public problem as the law which gives them license.
BOTH are problems, though I agree adopting a problem as civic POLICY exacerbates it. Hence complaints against "institutional racism," which correctly identify the guilty party despite mistaking the principal crime. I am not exactly holding my breath expecting much "progress" there though; the lefts leadership mistakes the problems main cause, but the rights refuses to even admit it EXISTS, so what progress is possible?
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love
still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.