Or, you know, she might be thinking of somebody else entirely - but I do remember when hearing about Bowie that I was thinking of that same rule of three and wondering who the third after Lemmy and him would be. Certainly wasn't expecting it to be Alan Rickman.
Well, Martin must be writing the script for 2016!
14/01/2016 03:30:15 PM
- 1021 Views
He had some great roles that I remember him from before his HP days.
14/01/2016 03:56:00 PM
- 746 Views
Celebrity deaths don't usually affect me much
14/01/2016 05:57:15 PM
- 687 Views
Who is the third one?
14/01/2016 09:28:26 PM
- 576 Views
Lemmy from Mötörhead?
14/01/2016 10:23:24 PM
- 598 Views
Does that even count as B-list?
15/01/2016 01:23:47 AM
- 653 Views
Who's "comparing?"
15/01/2016 01:47:42 AM
- 613 Views

Joe is right. This rule of three thing is stupid and arbitrary
15/01/2016 06:27:52 PM
- 630 Views
Good for you, Tom
15/01/2016 09:37:09 PM
- 678 Views
For real?
15/01/2016 01:37:52 AM
- 629 Views
meh...
15/01/2016 01:52:16 AM
- 579 Views
LOL Some idiots take it as gospel and annoy the shit out of me with it.
15/01/2016 01:57:34 AM
- 599 Views
Two famous musicians died in short succession - the second more famous than the first, yes.
15/01/2016 07:24:57 PM
- 646 Views
Re: Two famous musicians died in short succession - the second more famous than the first, yes.
15/01/2016 10:12:25 PM
- 864 Views
I agree. I think Bowie is more relevant as a cultural phenomenon than as a musician.
14/01/2016 08:50:27 PM
- 626 Views
And this just in - it keeps getting worse!
21/01/2016 01:12:18 AM
- 787 Views
That cokehead had it comin'! *NM*
21/01/2016 03:00:01 AM
- 301 Views