Active Users:284 Time:06/05/2024 07:37:51 AM
being an ex-House member, he *IS* allowed classified information if it's meant for him moondog Send a noteboard - 31/10/2016 08:53:43 PM

the blanket statement of "i fher ex husband is carrying ... claddified infomration" being automatically bad is both rampant speculation and a lack of understanding how classified information works. i know you spent time in the military, so i would expect you to know how the "right to know" works where information is concerned.....

"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
So, uh, we're just not gonna talk about H. Clinton being back under FBI investigation, huh? *NM* - 30/10/2016 02:37:33 AM 677 Views
Until Comey clarifies, there's nothing to talk about - just speculate. - 30/10/2016 10:00:56 AM 500 Views
Nods *NM* - 30/10/2016 04:46:35 PM 221 Views
Do the math, Hillary is a known crook..... - 31/10/2016 02:21:40 AM 553 Views
You are bringing your biases and projections into this - 31/10/2016 02:17:21 PM 575 Views
I fher ex husband is carrying a laptop with claddified infomration it doesn't matter if they are new *NM* - 31/10/2016 08:17:33 PM 332 Views
being an ex-House member, he *IS* allowed classified information if it's meant for him - 31/10/2016 08:53:43 PM 488 Views
Being a CURRENT House memebr does not automatically give you a security clearance... - 01/11/2016 11:28:50 AM 450 Views
neither does having "claddified infomration" automatically presume criminal activity - 01/11/2016 04:43:24 PM 627 Views
This is where you are actually wrong.... - 01/11/2016 06:04:57 PM 435 Views
More interesting then anything.... - 01/11/2016 06:08:19 PM 466 Views
so you have read the contents of the emails in question? that is the larger point here - 02/11/2016 08:05:53 PM 479 Views
In theory, I agree with you... - 03/11/2016 03:48:58 PM 488 Views
Re: In theory, I agree with you... - 04/11/2016 06:01:55 PM 476 Views
I do love how, for the Dems, he went from... - 31/10/2016 02:17:42 PM 482 Views
Ewww. *NM* - 04/11/2016 04:06:37 PM 189 Views
she's not under any investigation whatsoever - 31/10/2016 06:00:14 PM 449 Views

Reply to Message