Active Users:183 Time:19/05/2024 02:54:24 AM
More interesting then anything.... Jeordam Send a noteboard - 01/11/2016 06:08:19 PM

is seeing the dichotomy of the situation. This is yet another trust issue for H.Clinton.

She wants to be the Commander in Chief...yet she cannot even adequately command her own staff to not be complete screw-ups.

And these are people who will do anything for her. They are working for her, because they care/believe in her. Just wait until she takes a job in which a good portion of people don't like her, and an even greater amount of people just chose her because they didn't like the alternative.

~Jeordam

ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Reply to message
So, uh, we're just not gonna talk about H. Clinton being back under FBI investigation, huh? *NM* - 30/10/2016 02:37:33 AM 679 Views
Until Comey clarifies, there's nothing to talk about - just speculate. - 30/10/2016 10:00:56 AM 504 Views
Nods *NM* - 30/10/2016 04:46:35 PM 223 Views
Do the math, Hillary is a known crook..... - 31/10/2016 02:21:40 AM 557 Views
You are bringing your biases and projections into this - 31/10/2016 02:17:21 PM 578 Views
I fher ex husband is carrying a laptop with claddified infomration it doesn't matter if they are new *NM* - 31/10/2016 08:17:33 PM 334 Views
being an ex-House member, he *IS* allowed classified information if it's meant for him - 31/10/2016 08:53:43 PM 492 Views
Being a CURRENT House memebr does not automatically give you a security clearance... - 01/11/2016 11:28:50 AM 453 Views
neither does having "claddified infomration" automatically presume criminal activity - 01/11/2016 04:43:24 PM 631 Views
This is where you are actually wrong.... - 01/11/2016 06:04:57 PM 443 Views
More interesting then anything.... - 01/11/2016 06:08:19 PM 470 Views
so you have read the contents of the emails in question? that is the larger point here - 02/11/2016 08:05:53 PM 482 Views
In theory, I agree with you... - 03/11/2016 03:48:58 PM 492 Views
Re: In theory, I agree with you... - 04/11/2016 06:01:55 PM 479 Views
I do love how, for the Dems, he went from... - 31/10/2016 02:17:42 PM 486 Views
Ewww. *NM* - 04/11/2016 04:06:37 PM 190 Views
she's not under any investigation whatsoever - 31/10/2016 06:00:14 PM 452 Views

Reply to Message