Active Users:615 Time:25/04/2026 01:39:18 PM
It only looks that way from the outside. HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 10/03/2017 04:24:25 PM

View original post
If BCBS insures 5 different companies (5 groups), each is not priced to be profitable by itself, but such that the overall BCBS profit level is achieved. Groups that cost BCBS more are subsidized by groups that cost them less. This is also true if BCBS has one company in a group and that company has locations in 5 different states. Most insurance companies already have networks of providers in multiple states/locales.

The actual mechanics of the plan are entirely different from the appearance. In your example of a business that operates in 5 states, but has their insurance through BC/BS. The employees in each state are not being covered by the same insurance company, even though it appears so. Underneath BC/BS is BC/BS Alabama, BC/BS Georgia, BC/BS Mississippi, etc. Each of them contracts physicians, and administers health plans that are slightly different in benefits and premiums. All the group plans for a particular state are in the same "risk pool" regardless of the company. In other words, the risk pool isn't the business, but the geographic region.

The major insurance carriers work VERY hard to appear to be a seamless national whole for marketing purposes but appearance is all it is.

Reply to message
Obama care repeal and replace - 07/03/2017 12:33:18 AM 992 Views
The new House version looks fine..... - 07/03/2017 03:12:55 AM 752 Views
They do expand health saving accounts *NM* - 07/03/2017 11:27:50 AM 357 Views
The "accross state lines" buzz is a farce. Do YOU want a PCP that is 800 miles away? *NM* - 07/03/2017 09:18:57 PM 395 Views
That isn't what it means at all. - 08/03/2017 03:21:27 AM 751 Views
But physician networks are local - 09/03/2017 04:25:33 PM 746 Views
Of course they are. - 09/03/2017 04:52:31 PM 645 Views
And your insurance premium would be WAY higher than it currently is with a native MA company. - 10/03/2017 02:21:21 PM 704 Views
The risk can be spread across networks, as it is today. - 10/03/2017 02:33:38 PM 770 Views
It only looks that way from the outside. - 10/03/2017 04:24:25 PM 713 Views
One breakdown - 07/03/2017 10:25:12 AM 869 Views
My head is going to blow up from reading all this news - 07/03/2017 09:16:22 PM 926 Views
From the little I understand... - 07/03/2017 10:13:01 PM 777 Views
They can make it work and will just rasie rates - 08/03/2017 03:52:50 PM 704 Views
That's the point though, isn't it? - 08/03/2017 04:35:56 PM 740 Views
but it was the young that made it work and they are already opting out - 10/03/2017 02:56:50 PM 681 Views
it wasn't a bone - 10/03/2017 02:30:00 PM 819 Views
The problem withthat argument is it ignore human nature - 10/03/2017 03:18:06 PM 766 Views
I'm not ignoring it, I am illustrating it. - 10/03/2017 04:39:45 PM 716 Views
You know what I would propose? - 08/03/2017 03:06:27 PM 774 Views
decoupling health insurance from employment eliminates an existing subsidy - 08/03/2017 03:25:27 PM 704 Views
So what? - 08/03/2017 03:53:29 PM 714 Views
I wasn't raising it as a show-stopper, because obviously it isn't one. - 08/03/2017 04:17:47 PM 753 Views
As a self-employed individual, I have little sympathy for extending employer-based care - 09/03/2017 03:41:59 AM 733 Views
And it has caused the wage level to stagnate since then. - 10/03/2017 02:35:12 PM 736 Views
It is was of the many broken parts of our health care system - 10/03/2017 03:20:19 PM 712 Views
Looks good to me - 08/03/2017 03:58:48 PM 723 Views
This would solve a lot of the problems with cost and access. - 08/03/2017 04:11:15 PM 781 Views
Some serious problems - 09/03/2017 04:49:35 PM 773 Views
How do we elect you Tom? This is really good stuff. *NM* - 09/03/2017 05:25:56 PM 471 Views
As to healthcare itself, how are there no good options? - 14/03/2017 01:59:17 PM 789 Views
I'm glad you asked... - 14/03/2017 02:36:40 PM 832 Views

Reply to Message