Active Users:1960 Time:30/09/2026 07:20:58 PM
the reason why Canadians with money seek treatment in the US is not bureaucracy damookster Send a noteboard - 14/03/2017 04:00:09 PM

it's availability of services. The long wait times for digital imaging services in Canada is driven by the simple fact that we have far more such available hardware than they do in Canada.

To illustrate, I went to my primary care doctor last summer for persistent pain, tingling and numbness in my left shoulder. I was sent for x-rays and a CT scan that same day. I had an MRI three days later. Within a weeks time I had a diagnosis of brachial nerve irritation due to arthritic bone spurs in the cervical spine and a recommendation that it be treated without surgery until absolutely necessary.

Inn Canada, per a report by the Fraser Institute in November of 2016, "Canadians could expect to wait 3.7 weeks for a computed tomography (CT) scan, 11.1 weeks for a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, and 4.0 weeks for an ultrasound."

Mook

*MySmiley*



"Bustin' makes me feel good!"

Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
Reply to message
Obama care repeal and replace - 07/03/2017 12:33:18 AM 1077 Views
The new House version looks fine..... - 07/03/2017 03:12:55 AM 829 Views
They do expand health saving accounts *NM* - 07/03/2017 11:27:50 AM 403 Views
The "accross state lines" buzz is a farce. Do YOU want a PCP that is 800 miles away? *NM* - 07/03/2017 09:18:57 PM 439 Views
That isn't what it means at all. - 08/03/2017 03:21:27 AM 837 Views
But physician networks are local - 09/03/2017 04:25:33 PM 843 Views
Of course they are. - 09/03/2017 04:52:31 PM 725 Views
And your insurance premium would be WAY higher than it currently is with a native MA company. - 10/03/2017 02:21:21 PM 787 Views
The risk can be spread across networks, as it is today. - 10/03/2017 02:33:38 PM 863 Views
It only looks that way from the outside. - 10/03/2017 04:24:25 PM 797 Views
One breakdown - 07/03/2017 10:25:12 AM 948 Views
My head is going to blow up from reading all this news - 07/03/2017 09:16:22 PM 1041 Views
From the little I understand... - 07/03/2017 10:13:01 PM 861 Views
They can make it work and will just rasie rates - 08/03/2017 03:52:50 PM 785 Views
That's the point though, isn't it? - 08/03/2017 04:35:56 PM 825 Views
but it was the young that made it work and they are already opting out - 10/03/2017 02:56:50 PM 757 Views
it wasn't a bone - 10/03/2017 02:30:00 PM 900 Views
The problem withthat argument is it ignore human nature - 10/03/2017 03:18:06 PM 857 Views
I'm not ignoring it, I am illustrating it. - 10/03/2017 04:39:45 PM 804 Views
You know what I would propose? - 08/03/2017 03:06:27 PM 864 Views
decoupling health insurance from employment eliminates an existing subsidy - 08/03/2017 03:25:27 PM 787 Views
So what? - 08/03/2017 03:53:29 PM 795 Views
I wasn't raising it as a show-stopper, because obviously it isn't one. - 08/03/2017 04:17:47 PM 837 Views
As a self-employed individual, I have little sympathy for extending employer-based care - 09/03/2017 03:41:59 AM 824 Views
And it has caused the wage level to stagnate since then. - 10/03/2017 02:35:12 PM 825 Views
It is was of the many broken parts of our health care system - 10/03/2017 03:20:19 PM 802 Views
Looks good to me - 08/03/2017 03:58:48 PM 796 Views
This would solve a lot of the problems with cost and access. - 08/03/2017 04:11:15 PM 868 Views
Some serious problems - 09/03/2017 04:49:35 PM 857 Views
How do we elect you Tom? This is really good stuff. *NM* - 09/03/2017 05:25:56 PM 523 Views
As to healthcare itself, how are there no good options? - 14/03/2017 01:59:17 PM 877 Views
I'm glad you asked... - 14/03/2017 02:36:40 PM 927 Views
I have heard it said that "the perfect is the enemy of the good" - 14/03/2017 03:03:34 PM 887 Views
the reason why Canadians with money seek treatment in the US is not bureaucracy - 14/03/2017 04:00:09 PM 771 Views

Reply to Message