Now let me qualify everything here...I am by no means a law expert (or even novice for that matter), Constitutional knowledge expert, or anything of that nature. The closest thing I got to law education is an A in my Business Law class when getting my MBA, and watching all the good episodes of Law & Order. So with that all being said....
Isn't there a difference between the topics within the Bill of Rights and the enumerated powers granted to the Feds and the States? That the BoR are aspects that the framers recognized as inherent to freedom? And then the enumerated powers were for order, protection, governance, and such?
~Jeordam
ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
London yesterday, Antwerp today (thwarted by authorities)...
- 23/03/2017 05:09:48 PM
601 Views
This brings up an interesting thought.....(off topic)
- 23/03/2017 06:06:54 PM
504 Views
this is why the writers of the Constitution didn't want to include a Bill of Rights
- 23/03/2017 06:28:11 PM
451 Views
Bill of Rights vs. Enumerated Powers
- 23/03/2017 07:13:30 PM
438 Views
I know it was almost 50 years ago...
- 23/03/2017 07:35:23 PM
510 Views
Which brings to mind the falibility of man....
- 23/03/2017 08:34:07 PM
457 Views
Re: Bill of Rights vs. Enumerated Powers
- 24/03/2017 10:56:12 AM
511 Views
the framers believee we should be well armed enought to be threat to government
- 24/03/2017 01:14:13 PM
436 Views
Better idea - make firearms licensing and registration as simple and default as for vehicles.
- 24/03/2017 11:00:35 AM
452 Views