Active Users:337 Time:03/05/2024 04:35:56 AM
Why did 50 sponsors drop him? random thoughts Send a noteboard - 21/04/2017 05:47:25 PM

They were being threatened with boycotts. That is all they cared about. We don't get this same level of reaction and that's of boycotts when it is Liberal being accused. Hell the a academy awards have a Oscar to a child rapist and the people defending him were not boycotted. The offended are more motivated by the offender than the offense.

The question isn't what the motivation of the companies was but what was the motivation of those threatening them is. Maybe I am a cynic but I see no reason to believe their motivation was derived more from their disgust and his mostly unknown offenses and a wealth of reasons to think it wad his views and their attitude about his network. If I am right about their motivation, and we know I'm not, then it is censorship plain and simple. It doesn't even matter if he is guilty, it certainly doesn't matter to those threatening boycotts.

This message last edited by random thoughts on 21/04/2017 at 05:49:52 PM
Reply to message
Fox News gives Bill O'Reilly the sack - 19/04/2017 09:09:02 PM 765 Views
Not a bad thing for Fox News fans..... - 19/04/2017 09:30:35 PM 525 Views
Is unacceptable unless your a liberal - 20/04/2017 01:02:04 AM 561 Views
We figured this out on Nov 9th, 2016 - 20/04/2017 04:23:43 AM 559 Views
I am beginning to suspect pharmaceuticals are involved - 20/04/2017 04:34:56 AM 501 Views
My guess is 2 - 20/04/2017 05:29:06 AM 481 Views
Pharmaceuticals are involved - 20/04/2017 06:02:44 AM 525 Views
That is all a load of crap used to avoid accepting that this is about censorship - 20/04/2017 12:09:51 PM 492 Views
Democrats don't own "morality" and run on it the way Republicans do. - 20/04/2017 03:22:06 PM 495 Views
Horse shit - 20/04/2017 04:42:00 PM 567 Views
Gurrrl, stop the spin! - 20/04/2017 05:03:02 PM 482 Views
Also, why are you bringing in 16th century Germans into this conversation? - 20/04/2017 05:23:43 PM 463 Views
The whole things is noth but spin form one end to the other - 21/04/2017 03:57:19 PM 575 Views
Please. You are the only spinner here. Censorship? What a joke of a claim. *NM* - 21/04/2017 05:21:39 PM 323 Views
The Ann Coulter / Berkley thing may be about censorship - 21/04/2017 08:08:35 PM 477 Views
Firing O'Reilly is about censorship? Really? - 20/04/2017 05:53:09 PM 506 Views
I'm not sure it was the smartest thing to do - 20/04/2017 09:43:10 PM 446 Views
Regarding corporate policy - 20/04/2017 11:16:11 PM 575 Views
Find me someone like that - I'll sue the fuck out of their corporation - 21/04/2017 05:10:30 PM 440 Views
The company isn't stupid - 21/04/2017 05:17:19 PM 506 Views
Zero tolerance doesn't leave much room for nuance. - 21/04/2017 05:31:39 PM 534 Views
Your points are pointless - 21/04/2017 04:07:37 PM 589 Views
We are debating different things - 21/04/2017 04:55:18 PM 484 Views
Why did 50 sponsors drop him? - 21/04/2017 05:47:25 PM 511 Views
Okay you are using motivated reasoning, to change the subject - 21/04/2017 02:42:49 AM 426 Views
I agree with you - 21/04/2017 03:10:29 AM 467 Views
So??/ - 21/04/2017 04:13:13 PM 524 Views
Welcome to capitalism, baby. *NM* - 20/04/2017 01:57:25 AM 209 Views
He should write a book "Killing Bill O'Reilly" - 20/04/2017 05:26:32 AM 445 Views
I suspect you are correct as to the target audience for his books - 20/04/2017 01:11:15 PM 504 Views
ISn't that about he the reading level of cable news in general? - 20/04/2017 04:49:11 PM 484 Views
Was he even relevant to the cultural zeitgeist? - 20/04/2017 03:19:40 PM 472 Views
Agreed - 20/04/2017 03:25:42 PM 495 Views
It did have that vibe - 21/04/2017 05:01:51 PM 466 Views
It wasn't the lawsuits that did him in, it was how he treated people. - 28/04/2017 01:53:06 PM 454 Views

Reply to Message