Active Users:352 Time:03/05/2024 11:42:41 AM
Regarding corporate policy damookster Send a noteboard - 20/04/2017 11:16:11 PM

Technically you are absolutely right. One accused of sexual harassment is innocent until proven guilty. Unfortunately the reality of the situation, at least at any big corporation where I have worked, is that once one employee brings such a claim to HR against another, you can stick a fork in the accused. His or her career is done. Most companies lean heavily towards the accuser if for no other reason that to ensure they can't be included in any civil suit. Since most of these situations are he said/she said anyway, by favoring the accuser they head off the claim that the company fosters a hostile work environment.

Obviously if there are witnesses then that's different. But in a no witness scenario, even if the accused doesn't get fired, they will soon leave on their own. Unless they like no hope of ever having an upward career path.

I'm not speculating on this. I can give at least two examples, at different companies, that I have personally seen.

Mook

*MySmiley*



"Bustin' makes me feel good!"

Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
Reply to message
Fox News gives Bill O'Reilly the sack - 19/04/2017 09:09:02 PM 767 Views
Not a bad thing for Fox News fans..... - 19/04/2017 09:30:35 PM 525 Views
Is unacceptable unless your a liberal - 20/04/2017 01:02:04 AM 561 Views
We figured this out on Nov 9th, 2016 - 20/04/2017 04:23:43 AM 560 Views
I am beginning to suspect pharmaceuticals are involved - 20/04/2017 04:34:56 AM 502 Views
My guess is 2 - 20/04/2017 05:29:06 AM 482 Views
Pharmaceuticals are involved - 20/04/2017 06:02:44 AM 525 Views
That is all a load of crap used to avoid accepting that this is about censorship - 20/04/2017 12:09:51 PM 493 Views
Democrats don't own "morality" and run on it the way Republicans do. - 20/04/2017 03:22:06 PM 495 Views
Horse shit - 20/04/2017 04:42:00 PM 567 Views
Gurrrl, stop the spin! - 20/04/2017 05:03:02 PM 483 Views
Also, why are you bringing in 16th century Germans into this conversation? - 20/04/2017 05:23:43 PM 465 Views
The whole things is noth but spin form one end to the other - 21/04/2017 03:57:19 PM 576 Views
Please. You are the only spinner here. Censorship? What a joke of a claim. *NM* - 21/04/2017 05:21:39 PM 324 Views
The Ann Coulter / Berkley thing may be about censorship - 21/04/2017 08:08:35 PM 478 Views
Firing O'Reilly is about censorship? Really? - 20/04/2017 05:53:09 PM 507 Views
I'm not sure it was the smartest thing to do - 20/04/2017 09:43:10 PM 446 Views
Regarding corporate policy - 20/04/2017 11:16:11 PM 576 Views
Find me someone like that - I'll sue the fuck out of their corporation - 21/04/2017 05:10:30 PM 442 Views
The company isn't stupid - 21/04/2017 05:17:19 PM 507 Views
Zero tolerance doesn't leave much room for nuance. - 21/04/2017 05:31:39 PM 535 Views
Your points are pointless - 21/04/2017 04:07:37 PM 590 Views
We are debating different things - 21/04/2017 04:55:18 PM 485 Views
Why did 50 sponsors drop him? - 21/04/2017 05:47:25 PM 511 Views
Okay you are using motivated reasoning, to change the subject - 21/04/2017 02:42:49 AM 427 Views
I agree with you - 21/04/2017 03:10:29 AM 468 Views
So??/ - 21/04/2017 04:13:13 PM 525 Views
Welcome to capitalism, baby. *NM* - 20/04/2017 01:57:25 AM 210 Views
He should write a book "Killing Bill O'Reilly" - 20/04/2017 05:26:32 AM 446 Views
I suspect you are correct as to the target audience for his books - 20/04/2017 01:11:15 PM 504 Views
ISn't that about he the reading level of cable news in general? - 20/04/2017 04:49:11 PM 485 Views
Was he even relevant to the cultural zeitgeist? - 20/04/2017 03:19:40 PM 472 Views
Agreed - 20/04/2017 03:25:42 PM 496 Views
It did have that vibe - 21/04/2017 05:01:51 PM 466 Views
It wasn't the lawsuits that did him in, it was how he treated people. - 28/04/2017 01:53:06 PM 454 Views

Reply to Message