Active Users:495 Time:06/10/2025 09:37:16 PM
No, they'd have rectified a series of mistakes Isaac Send a noteboard - 06/10/2009 12:54:29 AM
If MacArthur hadn't surrounded himself with sycophants and ignored glaring evidence that China had moved massive numbers of troops into the area they could have been a defensive position near their supply lines and they wouldn't have needed to nukes to bloody China's nose.


Oh agreed, MacArthur was all bravado, which is why need to always be careful throwing generals into the public eye, they start thinking they're Napoleon or Alexander. However, intelligence mistakes are a given regardless, once the excrement hit the proverbial fan, deploying nuclear ordinance would have won, and the backlash wouldn't have been as big then, people hadn't demonized nuclear weapons as much yet. Speaking as a physicist, tactical nuclear weaponry deployed away from cities isn't that big a deal, the world doesn't end, the ground isn't ruined for centuries in a hundred mile radius or something, and fallout was never the cataclysmic thing it was portrayed as. I'm not a big fan of nukes, but a weapon is a weapon, and dead is dead, better them than us, etc.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
More troops to Afghan - what will Obama do? - 05/10/2009 04:02:29 PM 776 Views
The current situtation is untenable. - 05/10/2009 04:59:50 PM 356 Views
Definitely untenable - go all in or get out - 05/10/2009 05:08:05 PM 464 Views
We have to tread carefully with Pakistan - 06/10/2009 05:55:19 AM 366 Views
Obama is trapped by his own rhetoric - 05/10/2009 05:28:43 PM 412 Views
One quick thing..... - 05/10/2009 07:10:28 PM 479 Views
Not sure I agree - 05/10/2009 07:32:35 PM 356 Views
Well... - 05/10/2009 07:49:29 PM 359 Views
Nukes would have been a mistake - 06/10/2009 12:45:05 AM 306 Views
No, they'd have rectified a series of mistakes - 06/10/2009 12:54:29 AM 356 Views
Missed my point a bit/or I was unclear, but I think we agree..... - 05/10/2009 08:13:54 PM 439 Views
Pulling out now would be bad because... - 06/10/2009 12:26:28 AM 357 Views
Hooaahh!! Another for the green - 06/10/2009 12:34:20 AM 482 Views
Well... - 06/10/2009 01:18:43 AM 512 Views
Have you looked into HUMINT? - 06/10/2009 03:07:27 AM 323 Views
I have thought about it. I consider crypto-linguist as well. - 06/10/2009 05:53:34 AM 454 Views
It's tricky - 06/10/2009 03:47:27 AM 366 Views
OK, thanks. - 06/10/2009 02:06:32 PM 344 Views
Yes, that's major thing - 06/10/2009 05:22:35 PM 340 Views
how old are you? - 06/10/2009 12:40:22 AM 326 Views
1,2,3,4... United States Marine Corp!!! - 06/10/2009 12:45:11 AM 382 Views
The few the proud but not the old - 06/10/2009 04:06:12 AM 320 Views
Screw your top off jarhead, he's ours - 06/10/2009 12:46:20 AM 356 Views
what does the army have in common with bannas? - 06/10/2009 03:58:07 AM 384 Views
You mean bananas? - 06/10/2009 04:07:25 AM 329 Views
marines can't spell - 06/10/2009 03:10:06 PM 331 Views
Hooah *NM* - 06/10/2009 12:55:04 AM 160 Views
I'll give you one back one day when I earn the right to say it. *NM* - 07/10/2009 02:35:01 AM 150 Views

Reply to Message