I really, really enjoyed this particular piece. I never knew this much space could be used to say "we are not allowed to tell you anything". I am not being snarky. I love it. It is beautiful. And it really does pique my curiosity.
That was the idea; to pique curiosity so people will find out what the hell they're not allowed to tell people about.
Well, of course. But it was beautifully done.
What is this Wikileaks site? Is it reliable?
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Guardian gagged
- 13/10/2009 10:19:23 AM
1061 Views
The new "silly" one is quite excellent, thankyouverymuch 
*NM*
- 13/10/2009 10:52:33 AM
319 Views
*NM*
- 13/10/2009 10:52:33 AM
319 Views
And you do NOT replace David Morissey with Ben Affleck
- 13/10/2009 11:28:51 AM
657 Views
It was Affleck's best performance to date
- 13/10/2009 11:39:22 AM
668 Views
Re: It was Affleck's best performance to date
- 13/10/2009 11:52:16 AM
665 Views
This argument is irrelevant.
- 13/10/2009 01:27:01 PM
649 Views
Re: This argument is irrelevant.
- 13/10/2009 02:39:35 PM
667 Views
*NM*
Apparently....
- 13/10/2009 01:41:39 PM
682 Views
Fascinating
- 13/10/2009 02:40:58 PM
682 Views
The article itself is highly amusing. The content... somewhat disturbing actually.
- 13/10/2009 05:06:38 PM
680 Views
I'm very curious
- 13/10/2009 05:10:03 PM
1008 Views
The gag has been dropped. Also: write a freaking constitution already. *NM*
- 14/10/2009 12:40:01 AM
326 Views
*NM*
- 14/10/2009 12:40:01 AM
326 Views
Don't really need one. There is an earlier rulin which makes this one problematic, I think?
- 14/10/2009 08:49:22 AM
650 Views
Re: Guardian gagged
- 15/10/2009 12:16:17 AM
818 Views
Re: Guardian gagged
- 15/10/2009 09:43:00 AM
612 Views