Is it really discrimination? He is not singling out any race, which is what discrimination means...
Cannoli Send a noteboard - 17/10/2009 04:37:11 PM
Seriously though, the ACLU needs to put a sock in it. No one should be made to facilitate something he is opposed to because of his beliefs, no matter how ridiculous.
I don't know the letter of the law, but it's obvious that the law is that 1)Discrimination in government based on race is not allowed and 2) Interracial marriages are perfectly legal.
If the judge is saying, "No, I will not grant your marriage license specifically because it is an interracial marriage," it's the same thing as the US Government going "You cannot get married because this is an interracial marriage."
The judge is a representative of the government. He must obey its laws.
Now, if it was a minister of some church, that would not be a legal issue.
The real issue here is whether or not he has leeway to grant or withhold the license. If he DOES have the ability to use his judgment, than he should be able to deny the license on these grounds. No one would fault him for refusing permission for a teenager to marry a significantly older person (in my state, you need permission from a judge to marry if you are only 16), but that is discrimination based on age. The judge is not actually practicing discrimination, since he marries black people, and white people, and apparently does not refuse permission of more blacks than whites or vice versa. No can argue that he is not denying the black party something he is also denying the white party. He is treating them equally.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Interracial couple denied marriage license in La.
- 16/10/2009 03:44:53 AM
954 Views
What? He seems like a pretty rational guy.
- 16/10/2009 04:08:36 AM
495 Views
Yeah, he DOES have black friends! He even treats them like everyone else! Lol.
- 16/10/2009 05:15:13 AM
492 Views
Yeah. They don't have to crap in the yard. He says they can use his bathroom. *NM*
- 16/10/2009 03:47:24 PM
231 Views
Hell, I have friends who won't let me do that.
*NM*
- 16/10/2009 06:46:37 PM
202 Views
*NM*
- 16/10/2009 06:46:37 PM
202 Views
To get technical, he doesn't say he lets them... just that they do. *NM*
- 16/10/2009 07:11:29 PM
237 Views
I can't imagine why anyone would want to crap in this guy's lawn... it's a puzzler. *NM*
- 16/10/2009 08:57:06 PM
242 Views
WTF? what is wrong with people?! this makes me wanna pull my hair out! its 2009!!!!
- 16/10/2009 04:19:49 AM
558 Views
How are mixed race children treated in Louisiana? Here, nobody under the age of 60 could care less
- 16/10/2009 05:19:49 AM
486 Views
aren't Cajuns a mix of multiple races (whites and indians mostly)?? Cajuns ARE Loiusiana *NM*
- 16/10/2009 05:05:18 PM
189 Views
You're confusing Cajuns with Creoles.
- 17/10/2009 07:28:35 AM
431 Views
Some unions are opposed because they can't breed - but here the ability to breed is the problem!
- 16/10/2009 11:37:34 AM
677 Views
- 16/10/2009 11:37:34 AM
677 Views
Wild guess: Civil rights act?
- 16/10/2009 03:04:58 PM
491 Views
Personal freedoms trump that. He was not outlawing or preventing it, just refusing to go along.
- 16/10/2009 03:34:22 PM
463 Views
In this case it might not make much of a difference, but you can't allow it as a general rule.
- 16/10/2009 03:39:52 PM
423 Views
Isn't JP a government position? In that case, his personal freedoms have nothing to do with it *NM*
- 16/10/2009 03:55:32 PM
233 Views
So the officials who obeyed the laws supporting race discrimination were doing good? *NM*
- 17/10/2009 04:26:13 PM
188 Views
the government should just get their fingers out of the marriage business
- 16/10/2009 05:14:02 PM
467 Views
*snorts*
- 19/10/2009 02:01:01 AM
512 Views
A judge is not a private citizen
- 16/10/2009 05:43:44 PM
459 Views
Is it really discrimination? He is not singling out any race, which is what discrimination means...
- 17/10/2009 04:37:11 PM
530 Views
Are you really saying that individuals cannot be discriminated against, only groups? *NM*
- 17/10/2009 04:46:33 PM
177 Views
Um, it seems to me he's discriminating against mixed-race children. *NM*
- 18/10/2009 03:44:34 AM
176 Views
He's singling out mixed-race couples
- 19/10/2009 04:59:17 AM
614 Views
Dear Lord, you really are one of the most special people I've ever known.
- 16/10/2009 09:40:16 PM
479 Views
Psh, everyone knows that mixed-race babies are the cutest, anyway
- 16/10/2009 05:51:03 PM
447 Views
Another argument in support of the judge - cute babies are jerks. Ugly babies are much friendlier
- 17/10/2009 04:25:20 PM
456 Views
Why can't they just go to another JotP? Why MUST this guy cave in?
- 22/10/2009 11:26:32 PM
479 Views
Um. 'Cuz what he's doing is illegal?
- 22/10/2009 11:28:10 PM
399 Views
lol Judging from your response, I take it you didn't even fully read my response title!
- 23/10/2009 07:51:48 PM
468 Views

*NM*
r is a n