Active Users:590 Time:27/08/2026 01:13:36 AM
It does matter to what you were saying, though. Nate Send a noteboard - 24/10/2009 06:32:32 AM
You said that a hate crime law like that makes your life worth less than someone else's, but it doesn't. If you were killed by a homosexual man because you were heterosexual and he hated your sexual orientation, he could be charged with a hate crime. Voila, your life is worth exactly the same as everyone else's, in the sense that you were talking about.

It does not discriminate against straight people, because straight people are "protected" in the same way gay people are, in that if they are the victim of violence based on the hate of sexual orientation, the perpetrator can be charged with a hate crime.

Just because laws like this are created because most of the violence flows one way does not mean they discriminate against the side that initiates most of that violence. Heterosexuality is a sexual orientation, and is thus "protected" in the same way as homosexuality. That goes for all the things that qualify as hate crimes. If a black man attacks a white man because he hates white people, that is a hate crime in the same way as if a white man attacks a black man because he hates black people. It is all the same under a law like this. The law is not discriminating against you, which is what your original post was about. The law is not discriminating against anyone.

It is saying that if a person attacks someone, anyone, just because they hate a generic classification of people that the victim belongs to, that is a hate crime. It is saying that attacking someone because you hate their race, religion, sexual orientation, etc, is different than attacking someone, for example, because you want their money.

Do you not think it's different? Do you not think that distinction is important? Do you not think we should care why people hurt each other?
Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Reply to message
Matthew Shepard act passed - 23/10/2009 07:54:07 PM 1010 Views
Meh - 23/10/2009 08:06:22 PM 604 Views
Federal punishment is usually harsher then state law - 23/10/2009 09:27:49 PM 584 Views
I honestly don't care that federal law is more harsh - 24/10/2009 01:04:16 AM 570 Views
68-29, eh? Party line division? *NM* - 23/10/2009 08:25:07 PM 228 Views
More or less - 23/10/2009 08:35:10 PM 591 Views
All hate crime legislation is stupid..... - 23/10/2009 10:15:02 PM 592 Views
I'm sure Orwell would be intrigued by his own prognosticative abilities. - 24/10/2009 12:52:24 AM 624 Views
Didn't we already slice crimes by degree of intention (e.g., murder vs. manslaughter) pre-Orwell? - 24/10/2009 05:23:56 AM 596 Views
Not sure I agree there - 24/10/2009 02:29:13 PM 584 Views
So it's inherently worse for a gay man to get beaten up than a straight guy? - 24/10/2009 03:45:43 AM 698 Views
Doesn't there have to be an indication ... - 24/10/2009 04:33:49 AM 567 Views
Doesn't matter, Same crime, same punishment, with no extra preference given to anyone. - 24/10/2009 04:48:22 AM 556 Views
It does matter to what you were saying, though. - 24/10/2009 06:32:32 AM 630 Views
One factor in this I don't like though - 24/10/2009 01:54:53 PM 570 Views
Correct - 24/10/2009 04:55:43 AM 566 Views
All orientations are protected. - 24/10/2009 05:17:55 AM 561 Views
Isn't killing or assaulting someone already illegal? - 24/10/2009 05:50:15 AM 544 Views
As per my reply to you above: - 24/10/2009 06:42:24 AM 571 Views
I said nothing as to what I think about hate crimes laws. - 24/10/2009 06:47:51 AM 567 Views
yes and how many black men are sentenced for attacking white men? - 24/10/2009 02:00:26 PM 542 Views
Couldn't say, Ray. - 25/10/2009 04:43:12 AM 735 Views
I don't support that anymore then I support hate crime laws. - 25/10/2009 02:33:27 PM 587 Views
they need to throw out all of the thought crime laws *NM* - 24/10/2009 02:04:30 PM 211 Views
Minor point. - 24/10/2009 04:46:25 PM 595 Views
Yeah I saw that and kind of scoffed as well - 24/10/2009 07:57:23 PM 569 Views
well since almost everything he said turned out to be BS why not that too? - 25/10/2009 02:36:25 PM 571 Views
That's my main objection, yes. - 25/10/2009 10:50:49 PM 566 Views

Reply to Message