Active Users:1642 Time:02/08/2026 11:53:28 AM
As I said, Anglicans have a strong identity. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 26/10/2009 06:29:38 AM
Falling in and out of Communion with various Anglican Churches isn't entirely new, although the Realignment does pose some very new problems. Still, it's the hyperconservative Anglicans who really are least likely to join the Roman Catholic Church. You're close about Anglican identity, but I think a better statement is "Most of what it emans to be Anglican is to see yourself as Not Catholic."

I still think schism is relatively unlikely. Impaired communion for the foreseeable future, though, I think is nearly certain.

EDIT: Part of the reason I find schism unlikely and joining the Roman Catholic church almost unthinkably improbable is the huge leeway various churches get. There's no real reason for Anglicans to convert en masse to Roman Catholicism when they can just leave the ECUSA and go to the Church of Kenya or the Southern Cone. That way they get to keep everything, including the name. There's just no real reason for Episcopalians to go Catholic when they can stay Anglican; either way, the authority goes overseas.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

This message last edited by Ghavrel on 26/10/2009 at 06:32:13 AM
Reply to message
Catholic Church reaccepting Anglicans allowing Anglicans to remain Anglicans in most things but name - 25/10/2009 11:15:50 PM 1389 Views
As you noted in your post, it's nothing new. And it's not likely to lead to much. - 26/10/2009 03:35:18 AM 1003 Views
I don't know about that, some have already left the communion, and you may have a schism - 26/10/2009 04:27:01 AM 921 Views
As I said, Anglicans have a strong identity. - 26/10/2009 06:29:38 AM 919 Views
definitly agree about the episcoplians - 26/10/2009 01:14:53 PM 933 Views
Wouldn't you say not believing in transubstantiation is an important theological difference? - 26/10/2009 08:39:00 AM 894 Views
To the common man no, it isn't a major difference - 26/10/2009 12:07:25 PM 970 Views
Re: To the common man no, it isn't a major difference - 26/10/2009 04:55:51 PM 1261 Views
I was going to mention that... - 26/10/2009 01:08:09 PM 926 Views
It should be noted - 26/10/2009 05:02:23 PM 904 Views
Catholicism = no ordination of women? - 26/10/2009 06:31:44 PM 925 Views
Re: Catholicism = no ordination of women? - 26/10/2009 07:40:45 PM 1027 Views
Ah. You're an Anglo-Catholic, then? - 26/10/2009 09:41:03 PM 939 Views
I prefer Anglican Catholic - 26/10/2009 11:41:12 PM 946 Views
what about the congregations that have a woman priest? - 27/10/2009 03:56:45 PM 1104 Views
Re: what about the congregations that have a woman priest? - 27/10/2009 04:37:16 PM 947 Views
Calling women in the priesthood a Christological heresy is ridiculous, - 27/10/2009 10:31:02 PM 921 Views
Re: Calling women in the priesthood a Christological heresy is ridiculous, - 28/10/2009 01:26:24 AM 988 Views
So in sum your response is tradition - 28/10/2009 02:50:06 AM 964 Views
Not tradition, but Tradition (capital) - 28/10/2009 04:15:40 PM 1218 Views
Yes the priest class of both the old testatment and new testatment has always been male - 28/10/2009 10:22:28 PM 1034 Views
Re: Yes the priest class of both the old testatment and new testatment has always been male - 29/10/2009 09:02:36 PM 1163 Views
Hun I am a former catholic - 29/10/2009 09:33:45 PM 933 Views
I am a former protestant - 30/10/2009 12:12:57 AM 1149 Views

Reply to Message