Active Users:840 Time:16/09/2026 08:34:01 PM
As I said, Anglicans have a strong identity. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 26/10/2009 06:29:38 AM
Falling in and out of Communion with various Anglican Churches isn't entirely new, although the Realignment does pose some very new problems. Still, it's the hyperconservative Anglicans who really are least likely to join the Roman Catholic Church. You're close about Anglican identity, but I think a better statement is "Most of what it emans to be Anglican is to see yourself as Not Catholic."

I still think schism is relatively unlikely. Impaired communion for the foreseeable future, though, I think is nearly certain.

EDIT: Part of the reason I find schism unlikely and joining the Roman Catholic church almost unthinkably improbable is the huge leeway various churches get. There's no real reason for Anglicans to convert en masse to Roman Catholicism when they can just leave the ECUSA and go to the Church of Kenya or the Southern Cone. That way they get to keep everything, including the name. There's just no real reason for Episcopalians to go Catholic when they can stay Anglican; either way, the authority goes overseas.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

This message last edited by Ghavrel on 26/10/2009 at 06:32:13 AM
Reply to message
Catholic Church reaccepting Anglicans allowing Anglicans to remain Anglicans in most things but name - 25/10/2009 11:15:50 PM 1418 Views
As you noted in your post, it's nothing new. And it's not likely to lead to much. - 26/10/2009 03:35:18 AM 1032 Views
I don't know about that, some have already left the communion, and you may have a schism - 26/10/2009 04:27:01 AM 949 Views
As I said, Anglicans have a strong identity. - 26/10/2009 06:29:38 AM 948 Views
definitly agree about the episcoplians - 26/10/2009 01:14:53 PM 956 Views
Wouldn't you say not believing in transubstantiation is an important theological difference? - 26/10/2009 08:39:00 AM 923 Views
To the common man no, it isn't a major difference - 26/10/2009 12:07:25 PM 1000 Views
Re: To the common man no, it isn't a major difference - 26/10/2009 04:55:51 PM 1290 Views
I was going to mention that... - 26/10/2009 01:08:09 PM 954 Views
It should be noted - 26/10/2009 05:02:23 PM 940 Views
Catholicism = no ordination of women? - 26/10/2009 06:31:44 PM 947 Views
Re: Catholicism = no ordination of women? - 26/10/2009 07:40:45 PM 1062 Views
Ah. You're an Anglo-Catholic, then? - 26/10/2009 09:41:03 PM 972 Views
I prefer Anglican Catholic - 26/10/2009 11:41:12 PM 971 Views
what about the congregations that have a woman priest? - 27/10/2009 03:56:45 PM 1131 Views
Re: what about the congregations that have a woman priest? - 27/10/2009 04:37:16 PM 983 Views
Calling women in the priesthood a Christological heresy is ridiculous, - 27/10/2009 10:31:02 PM 966 Views
Re: Calling women in the priesthood a Christological heresy is ridiculous, - 28/10/2009 01:26:24 AM 1018 Views
So in sum your response is tradition - 28/10/2009 02:50:06 AM 999 Views
Not tradition, but Tradition (capital) - 28/10/2009 04:15:40 PM 1245 Views
Yes the priest class of both the old testatment and new testatment has always been male - 28/10/2009 10:22:28 PM 1060 Views
Re: Yes the priest class of both the old testatment and new testatment has always been male - 29/10/2009 09:02:36 PM 1194 Views
Hun I am a former catholic - 29/10/2009 09:33:45 PM 964 Views
I am a former protestant - 30/10/2009 12:12:57 AM 1176 Views

Reply to Message