Re: I find it interesting to see it's that old.
everynametaken Send a noteboard - 02/11/2009 04:41:22 AM
That not only did Hubbard found it that long ago, but the IRS actually took it seriously as early as 1993, when here in Europe it's very much something of the 2000s. Of course, Europe having a less strict view of religious freedom (as of many things), new and very silly religions like Scientology are going to run into legal trouble hard, as indeed they do in France and Germany.
I wouldn't mind the movement collapsing, as it's hard to see it doing much good to balance out all the bad. So let's hope the defectors are right, though those experts were probably wise to question that.
I wouldn't mind the movement collapsing, as it's hard to see it doing much good to balance out all the bad. So let's hope the defectors are right, though those experts were probably wise to question that.
I do like the way Europe deals with these "new" religions a lot better than ourselves. Hell, I wouldn't even care that much if they practice their BS here, but tax exemption? Seriously!
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
Defections, court fights test Scientology
- 01/11/2009 11:08:00 PM
858 Views
I find it interesting to see it's that old.
- 01/11/2009 11:32:39 PM
492 Views
Re: I find it interesting to see it's that old.
- 02/11/2009 04:41:22 AM
434 Views
I don't think most people think the Mormons or Jehovah's Witnesses are "mainstream".
- 02/11/2009 12:29:51 AM
488 Views
I agree. When I read that I thought "bullshit". Especially about the JW's. *NM*
- 02/11/2009 04:40:05 AM
182 Views
Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, Daoism, Shintoism, Christianity, Islam, Mormonism, Scientologism.
- 02/11/2009 12:40:26 AM
516 Views
Yes, literalism and fundamentalism don't typically make a lot of sense. *NM*
- 02/11/2009 01:34:48 AM
173 Views
I beg to differ. Scientology is more ridiculous than the other religions mentioned.
- 02/11/2009 01:58:44 AM
559 Views
To you, perhaps. To me it's a wonderful fantasy like the rest. No more or less believable.
- 02/11/2009 02:19:17 AM
493 Views
What sources do you have for that statement?
- 02/11/2009 06:38:19 AM
463 Views
The point was about polytheism versus monotheism
- 02/11/2009 03:29:23 PM
439 Views
I take issue with your view of history
- 02/11/2009 04:25:24 PM
469 Views
The view of history is not monolithic. You are entitled to your views.
- 02/11/2009 04:36:45 PM
458 Views
Excellent post.....all religions are a little nutty, but Christianity was a natural extension to....
- 02/11/2009 02:43:49 AM
453 Views
Re: Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, Daoism, Shintoism, Christianity, Islam, Mormonism, Scientologism.
- 02/11/2009 04:03:49 AM
497 Views
Right. Unlike Christianity, which has harming your neighbor as one of its central precepts.
- 02/11/2009 06:34:16 AM
469 Views
Re: Right. Unlike Christianity, which has harming your neighbor as one of its central precepts.
- 02/11/2009 02:42:22 PM
483 Views
Your spelling is simply atrocious. Are you a non-native English speaker/writer?
- 02/11/2009 03:23:25 PM
462 Views
+1 to your question and add "abysmal grammar and style" *NM*
- 02/11/2009 04:28:08 PM
181 Views
Re: Your spelling is simply atrocious. Are you a non-native English speaker/writer?
- 03/11/2009 02:26:07 AM
424 Views
I think that you are wrong.
- 02/11/2009 03:48:20 PM
476 Views
Define, supporting/promoting a war?
- 02/11/2009 04:12:46 PM
460 Views
Agreed, and even some 19th century wars had at least partial religious motivations. *NM*
- 02/11/2009 05:38:22 PM
188 Views
Uh? I thought what was testing Scientology was its crazy-ass beliefs.....
*NM*
- 02/11/2009 02:38:07 AM
189 Views
*NM*
- 02/11/2009 02:38:07 AM
189 Views
