The point was about polytheism versus monotheism
The Shrike Send a noteboard - 02/11/2009 03:29:23 PM
To my knowledge, few Romans thought of Judaism in any way similar to the way modern people view Scientology.
Admittedly, Pliny and Suetonius call Christianity superstitio, but even that doesn't exactly mean "superstition" in the modern sense. Even if it did, that wasn't their opinion of Judaism.
Admittedly, Pliny and Suetonius call Christianity superstitio, but even that doesn't exactly mean "superstition" in the modern sense. Even if it did, that wasn't their opinion of Judaism.
You know perfectly well what the Romans thought about Judaism and then about Christianity. There are loads of sources, especially in Josephus' The Jewish War, about Jews who refused to recognize the Gods of Rome and the trouble that caused them. Especially once the emperors were considered divine. In a sea of Polytheism, you don't think that the Romans and Hellenistic peoples though that monotheism was an abhorrent aberration?
The goal of my earlier statement was to show that our present view of Scientology is truly no different than the Roman, Greek, and Jewish view of Christianity. A cult. And a bit of an odd cult at that, considering its stated monotheistic nature. But given the right conditions - economic or political or demographic - and a cult becomes a religion. Mormonism for instance is no odder or less odd than Scientology. And yet a century or so has passed and there is the faintest veneer of respectability surrounding it.
Defections, court fights test Scientology
01/11/2009 11:08:00 PM
- 801 Views
I don't think most people think the Mormons or Jehovah's Witnesses are "mainstream".
02/11/2009 12:29:51 AM
- 454 Views
I agree. When I read that I thought "bullshit". Especially about the JW's. *NM*
02/11/2009 04:40:05 AM
- 169 Views
Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, Daoism, Shintoism, Christianity, Islam, Mormonism, Scientologism.
02/11/2009 12:40:26 AM
- 482 Views
Yes, literalism and fundamentalism don't typically make a lot of sense. *NM*
02/11/2009 01:34:48 AM
- 161 Views
I beg to differ. Scientology is more ridiculous than the other religions mentioned.
02/11/2009 01:58:44 AM
- 519 Views
To you, perhaps. To me it's a wonderful fantasy like the rest. No more or less believable.
02/11/2009 02:19:17 AM
- 460 Views
What sources do you have for that statement?
02/11/2009 06:38:19 AM
- 435 Views
The point was about polytheism versus monotheism
02/11/2009 03:29:23 PM
- 403 Views
I take issue with your view of history
02/11/2009 04:25:24 PM
- 420 Views
The view of history is not monolithic. You are entitled to your views.
02/11/2009 04:36:45 PM
- 425 Views
Excellent post.....all religions are a little nutty, but Christianity was a natural extension to....
02/11/2009 02:43:49 AM
- 418 Views
Re: Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, Daoism, Shintoism, Christianity, Islam, Mormonism, Scientologism.
02/11/2009 04:03:49 AM
- 461 Views
Right. Unlike Christianity, which has harming your neighbor as one of its central precepts.
02/11/2009 06:34:16 AM
- 441 Views
Re: Right. Unlike Christianity, which has harming your neighbor as one of its central precepts.
02/11/2009 02:42:22 PM
- 448 Views
Your spelling is simply atrocious. Are you a non-native English speaker/writer?
02/11/2009 03:23:25 PM
- 431 Views
+1 to your question and add "abysmal grammar and style" *NM*
02/11/2009 04:28:08 PM
- 172 Views
Re: Your spelling is simply atrocious. Are you a non-native English speaker/writer?
03/11/2009 02:26:07 AM
- 389 Views
I think that you are wrong.
02/11/2009 03:48:20 PM
- 440 Views
Define, supporting/promoting a war?
02/11/2009 04:12:46 PM
- 423 Views
Agreed, and even some 19th century wars had at least partial religious motivations. *NM*
02/11/2009 05:38:22 PM
- 176 Views
Uh? I thought what was testing Scientology was its crazy-ass beliefs.....
*NM*
02/11/2009 02:38:07 AM
- 178 Views
