Active Users:1599 Time:10/09/2026 11:01:57 AM
They pretty much have. Legolas Send a noteboard - 02/12/2009 10:16:46 PM
I think a country has right to reasonable restrictions to protect their native culture. Form some of the reaction I have seen online you would think they had banned Muslim all together. Sorry but the idea that this is some sort of gross violation of human rights and sign of Switzerland slide into intolerance is simply silly hyperbola.

Edit: Sweden Switzerland same difference;)


There are exactly four minarets in the entirety of Switzerland, and it's not like there were plans to build tons more of them, either. This is nothing more or less than a declaration of mistrust in the Swiss Muslims. A violation of human rights it is not, but a sign of intolerance, absolutely.
Reply to message
It seems the Swiss ban on muslim minarets has passed rather quietly - 02/12/2009 04:15:22 PM 715 Views
This is surprising. - 02/12/2009 04:19:03 PM 433 Views
Not here, it certainly hasn't. - 02/12/2009 04:34:55 PM 456 Views
Nor here. It's all over our news. *NM* - 02/12/2009 10:01:57 PM 192 Views
I mostly support the Swiss decision. As from my comment at Der Spiegel, - 02/12/2009 05:54:11 PM 441 Views
Re: I mostly support the Swiss decision. As from my comment at Der Spiegel, - 02/12/2009 06:23:09 PM 435 Views
I understand the first in Qatar was built in 2003. - 02/12/2009 10:11:31 PM 404 Views
Yes, with no steeple and no bell! - 03/12/2009 12:48:12 AM 429 Views
Ah yes, now that you mention it. - 03/12/2009 12:52:26 AM 412 Views
see here is what i dont get - 03/12/2009 05:21:10 AM 402 Views
I saw it posted elsewhere - 02/12/2009 06:09:33 PM 399 Views
Does anyone know the legal effect of this referendum? - 02/12/2009 10:00:54 PM 425 Views
It's Switzerland. Their referendums are binding. - 02/12/2009 10:07:52 PM 441 Views
Do the Swiss think they live in 5th-century BC Athens or something? - 02/12/2009 10:11:29 PM 423 Views
Switzerland is odd in a great many ways. - 02/12/2009 10:14:26 PM 440 Views
Actually, I think I meant the European Court of Human Rights, not the ECJ. - 02/12/2009 10:16:38 PM 426 Views
Yeah, but does that one have any power? - 02/12/2009 10:17:54 PM 441 Views
ECHR Article 9 – Freedom of thought, conscience and religion - 02/12/2009 10:52:35 PM 528 Views
I feel like I'm missing something in this debate - 02/12/2009 11:21:03 PM 385 Views
The latter. - 02/12/2009 11:22:49 PM 433 Views
Huh, that's bizarre - 02/12/2009 11:39:03 PM 412 Views
It's coming from a party... - 02/12/2009 11:42:49 PM 524 Views
sicherheit schaffen, that's great! - 03/12/2009 12:00:00 AM 387 Views
I'm hoping you mean great in the bad way. - 03/12/2009 12:05:30 AM 425 Views
Re: I'm hoping you mean great in the bad way. - 03/12/2009 02:03:33 AM 417 Views
Thank you, I guess? - 03/12/2009 12:14:08 PM 411 Views
I don't really see a problem with it - 02/12/2009 10:09:55 PM 411 Views
They pretty much have. - 02/12/2009 10:16:46 PM 431 Views
that was kind of my thought - 03/12/2009 12:17:23 AM 391 Views
I would say it is a bit reactionary but i guess it depends on your definition of intolerance - 03/12/2009 03:39:48 PM 441 Views
Several points... - 03/12/2009 07:15:17 PM 427 Views
The Adhan can really get to you - 02/12/2009 11:14:47 PM 493 Views
At least that one can sing. - 02/12/2009 11:24:03 PM 433 Views
Re: At least that one can sing. - 02/12/2009 11:41:20 PM 418 Views
just wanted to say high - 03/12/2009 03:37:45 PM 431 Views
I think it seems kind of a silly waste of government power... - 03/12/2009 12:27:29 AM 409 Views
It's not the government that did it. *NM* - 03/12/2009 12:29:35 AM 195 Views
*re reads* Oh. I guess it's really power to the people over there - 03/12/2009 12:35:59 AM 382 Views
Unfortunately, sometimes... *NM* - 03/12/2009 12:15:29 PM 222 Views

Reply to Message