I have to say, considering how far apart the options for this answer were, it seemed very easy for me - if they had asked if it was closer to 9000, 10,000 or 11,000, it'd have been a different story, but to know the 10k number from the given options, you needn't have paid attention to this year's news at all. Of course, I did study economics, even if that wasn't in the US.
I agree with the first part, but I think the market was pretty close to 6,000 back in early spring. Are you done with school now?
And of course, the Afghanistan answers were very far apart as well, and I still got that wrong, so maybe I shouldn't be saying anything. 

No, you shouldn't. We, and by that I mean the community, expect lots of self-flagellation and begging for forgiveness.
南無阿弥陀仏!
Test Your Political IQ.....
- 11/12/2009 12:49:31 AM
1355 Views
Me Too!
- 11/12/2009 12:58:33 AM
774 Views
Pretty amazing that only 2% of respondents got all 12 questions right.....
- 11/12/2009 01:09:09 AM
730 Views
Because we're politically obsessive?
- 11/12/2009 03:58:28 AM
785 Views
Only 24% of people understand what cap and trade is.
- 11/12/2009 04:09:36 AM
736 Views
12/12. Of course, I'd probably do worse if it weren't current events. *NM*
- 11/12/2009 02:35:30 AM
356 Views
There's also a science one, on the same site
- 11/12/2009 04:13:05 AM
1166 Views
only missed the one about mars
- 11/12/2009 04:27:22 AM
807 Views
12. I think the selection bias would be stronger on this one. Also, they're much easier questions.
*NM*
- 11/12/2009 08:07:50 AM
392 Views
*NM*
- 11/12/2009 08:07:50 AM
392 Views
I don't agree, actually.
- 11/12/2009 10:34:36 AM
721 Views
It was a lot easier due to not having more than one america specific question. *NM*
- 11/12/2009 11:23:41 AM
366 Views
12 for 12 again! Me smart! Are there any others we can take?
*NM*
- 12/12/2009 05:07:56 AM
415 Views
*NM*
- 12/12/2009 05:07:56 AM
415 Views
11. Didn't know DOW, surprise, surprise. *NM*
- 11/12/2009 05:02:49 AM
388 Views
Me too. Either. Whatever. Capitalist scum can keep their meaningless statistics *NM*
- 11/12/2009 04:52:44 PM
392 Views
Like it or not, that number is all too meaningful for every American. And non-Americans, too. *NM*
- 11/12/2009 05:01:57 PM
393 Views
actually, that number is pretty damn meaningless for the average american
- 11/12/2009 05:24:07 PM
697 Views
You're dead wrong. That number influences all sorts of things that affect people, whether...
- 11/12/2009 05:32:01 PM
767 Views
Influential, yes. Readily known and called to mind, not so much.
- 11/12/2009 06:33:19 PM
732 Views
- 11/12/2009 06:33:19 PM
732 Views
I think it's a good example of how demographics can have an unexpected bias
- 11/12/2009 07:28:07 PM
806 Views
Eh? No mention of newspapers? Am I alone in getting most of my news by reading an actual...
- 11/12/2009 08:06:26 PM
763 Views
9. I haven't been paying attention to recent events. Two of them were statistics, unsurprisingly. *NM*
- 11/12/2009 08:06:15 AM
381 Views
11 - hesitated on the Afghanistan question and then picked the wrong one.
- 11/12/2009 10:37:21 AM
799 Views
6, and above average. Not bad for an Aussie with no interest in American politics.
- 11/12/2009 10:41:57 AM
800 Views
12/12. It's scary that 98% of people can't get it right.
- 11/12/2009 01:53:19 PM
749 Views
Perhaps...
- 11/12/2009 04:35:01 PM
821 Views
5% of the replies here. I doubt 5% of the replies at that site are from non-Americans.
- 11/12/2009 05:21:44 PM
759 Views
11/12 - I didn't give the official, read bullshit, number for unemployment. *NM*
- 11/12/2009 04:57:44 PM
358 Views
12 of 12, but besides the geography question, people should know those answers through osmosis.
- 11/12/2009 05:45:43 PM
702 Views
12/12 , im not surprised that alot of us got them all right, we are a pretty political group *NM*
- 13/12/2009 02:29:14 AM
376 Views

