I simply believe that it is moot. If the product tastes the same, then it is the product. In such a case, the main motivation for such protection is for the economics of the region. I believe this is a conceivably shaky argument, depending on ones view of legal monopolies.
It also protects the reputation that region has earnt for how it produces that product. They make that product so well that to some people, the name of the region and the product has become confused, much as some people call all vacuums Hoovers - Hoover is still a brand name though, so why shouldn't those regions be able to protect their brand?
They aren't monopolising the product, just their own name which has been built up. Anyone can still make their own version of those products, so it isn't a monopoly.
*MySmiley*
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
/ Booze: And the best whisky comes from?
- 25/01/2010 02:34:43 PM
713 Views
I was actually reading something about the whiskys Asia was churning out
- 25/01/2010 03:20:30 PM
288 Views
It's a protected label in the EU
- 25/01/2010 03:47:29 PM
439 Views
I still haven't decided if I approve of protected labels.
- 25/01/2010 04:41:45 PM
358 Views
Normally it would be a trade mark
- 25/01/2010 04:56:59 PM
274 Views
No, I am not missing that.
- 25/01/2010 05:02:04 PM
251 Views
Partly
- 25/01/2010 05:09:25 PM
259 Views
So then if a Scotch Whisky is made in Scotland...
- 25/01/2010 05:32:42 PM
388 Views
But the Taiwanese brand doesn't meet the standards for Scotch.
- 25/01/2010 05:54:43 PM
280 Views
I mean the standards of taste and quality
- 25/01/2010 06:52:10 PM
272 Views
But that's not really the point, is it?
- 25/01/2010 07:33:00 PM
251 Views
Just how I think about things then 
I think their body and substance is far more important.
- 25/01/2010 07:54:07 PM
310 Views
I think their body and substance is far more important.
- 25/01/2010 07:54:07 PM
310 Views
There's nothing snobby about protecting a brand which makes a lot of money for your country.
- 25/01/2010 04:03:45 PM
410 Views
I didn't say that it was snobby to do that.
- 25/01/2010 04:27:57 PM
300 Views
Re: I didn't say that it was snobby to do that.
- 25/01/2010 04:51:43 PM
342 Views
You still get my point.
- 25/01/2010 04:53:33 PM
246 Views
Why should they have to label it that?
- 25/01/2010 04:59:13 PM
273 Views
Because Scotch indicates a type of Whisky, not ONLY its location.
- 25/01/2010 05:09:09 PM
262 Views
There is, as far as I'm aware, nothing stopping them from doing that.
- 25/01/2010 05:13:14 PM
273 Views
And see, there's a difference in my mind.
- 25/01/2010 05:18:33 PM
269 Views
I guess so
- 25/01/2010 05:21:19 PM
289 Views
I so knew someone was going to say something along those lines 9_9
- 25/01/2010 05:35:59 PM
274 Views
You also should add that it is protecting the consumer
- 25/01/2010 04:34:22 PM
263 Views
again, though, there's no need to be rude 
- 25/01/2010 04:42:27 PM
265 Views
- 25/01/2010 04:42:27 PM
265 Views
I imagine so
- 25/01/2010 04:58:40 PM
276 Views
yes, how dare people make their own scotch.
- 25/01/2010 05:14:58 PM
272 Views
*NM*