Active Users:168 Time:17/06/2024 06:13:11 PM
Now you have egg on your face snoopcester Send a noteboard - 26/01/2010 11:30:31 AM
your nitpicking has nothing to do with what I was saying.


It fits what I'm saying perfectly though - duck's produce duck eggs and Scotland produces Scotch. Chicken's can't produce duck eggs, no matter what size, shape, taste etc those eggs have, and Taiwan can't produce scotch, no matter what is put into it or what it tastes like. The reason being that chickens aren't ducks and Taiwan isn't Scotland.
It is a regional name and the only reason non-Scottish producers want to be able to claim to produce Scotch is to mislead consumers who want to buy whiskey distilled in Scotland. Instead, they should be honest and put their efforts into promoting their own product, not trying to mislead people about it and cash in on a reputation others have earnt.
*MySmiley*

Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."

Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Reply to message
/ Booze: And the best whisky comes from? - 25/01/2010 02:34:43 PM 622 Views
I was actually reading something about the whiskys Asia was churning out - 25/01/2010 03:20:30 PM 213 Views
It's a protected label in the EU - 25/01/2010 03:47:29 PM 363 Views
I still haven't decided if I approve of protected labels. - 25/01/2010 04:41:45 PM 286 Views
Normally it would be a trade mark - 25/01/2010 04:56:59 PM 203 Views
No, I am not missing that. - 25/01/2010 05:02:04 PM 176 Views
Partly - 25/01/2010 05:09:25 PM 190 Views
So then if a Scotch Whisky is made in Scotland... - 25/01/2010 05:32:42 PM 305 Views
But the Taiwanese brand doesn't meet the standards for Scotch. - 25/01/2010 05:54:43 PM 212 Views
I mean the standards of taste and quality - 25/01/2010 06:52:10 PM 192 Views
But that's not really the point, is it? - 25/01/2010 07:33:00 PM 180 Views
There's nothing snobby about protecting a brand which makes a lot of money for your country. - 25/01/2010 04:03:45 PM 324 Views
I didn't say that it was snobby to do that. - 25/01/2010 04:27:57 PM 220 Views
Re: I didn't say that it was snobby to do that. - 25/01/2010 04:51:43 PM 276 Views
You still get my point. - 25/01/2010 04:53:33 PM 180 Views
Why should they have to label it that? - 25/01/2010 04:59:13 PM 205 Views
Because Scotch indicates a type of Whisky, not ONLY its location. - 25/01/2010 05:09:09 PM 187 Views
There is, as far as I'm aware, nothing stopping them from doing that. - 25/01/2010 05:13:14 PM 194 Views
And see, there's a difference in my mind. - 25/01/2010 05:18:33 PM 198 Views
I guess so - 25/01/2010 05:21:19 PM 217 Views
I so knew someone was going to say something along those lines 9_9 - 25/01/2010 05:35:59 PM 202 Views
Now you have egg on your face - 26/01/2010 11:30:31 AM 183 Views
You also should add that it is protecting the consumer - 25/01/2010 04:34:22 PM 192 Views
again, though, there's no need to be rude - 25/01/2010 04:42:27 PM 200 Views
I imagine so - 25/01/2010 04:58:40 PM 198 Views
yes, how dare people make their own scotch. - 25/01/2010 05:14:58 PM 203 Views
They moved to Scotland to make it then? - 25/01/2010 05:20:10 PM 203 Views
*NM* - 25/01/2010 05:38:49 PM 81 Views
Re: You also should add that it is protecting the consumer - 25/01/2010 05:37:30 PM 228 Views
*NM* - 25/01/2010 05:39:12 PM 93 Views
Pfft - 26/01/2010 10:20:58 AM 209 Views
Re: Pfft - 26/01/2010 10:22:52 AM 249 Views
Re: Pfft - 26/01/2010 11:17:31 AM 213 Views
Indeed - 26/01/2010 05:41:30 PM 188 Views
I am not a fan of protectionism but - 25/01/2010 05:59:36 PM 204 Views
the bartender *NM* - 28/01/2010 09:28:25 AM 110 Views

Reply to Message