Active Users:803 Time:14/12/2025 02:15:33 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Bah, I only have your word for that being how your spell your name snoopcester Send a noteboard - 01/02/2010 01:08:24 PM
RT probably has a point that a lot of people are objecting because they don't like the results, and I seriously doubt many of them had heard of the PPP before and were objecting for the reason I was. The results, credible or not, are probably in the right zone. I would say, as you mentioned, that people will tend to watch the channel they trust the most.


I just found it confusing that he was replying here about replies on a different website (so far as I can tell) - without saying that it refers to the replies actual article it gives an implication that it is about replies here. Which don't seem to be doing what he objects to.

My point, just to clarify, is that even if the results are dead on, doesn't mean they should be treated as valid, anymore than if I predicted two inches of rain next Tuesday in London and that's exactly what it turned out to be. A polling group that uses flawed methodology, especially deliberately flawed methodology as seems indicated for the PPP in some prior recent polls, shouldn't be treated as reliable even if they pick the lotto numbers right two nights in a row. I haven't really been watching this thread much, so I don't know if RT's assessment is correct about people's objections, but that is the origin of my objections.


I wasn't raising an objection to your point, I just mentioned you as you were one of the very, very few people here to raise an objection to the polling group. The only other objection I can see here is suggesting that due to an increasing number of people just having mobiles, telephone polling is now potentially missing some groups out.
Your closing sentence is why it is probably a good idea to be clear if you are commenting on replies that are on a different site.
*MySmiley*

Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."

Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Reply to message
Fox is most trusted name in news trzaska2000 - 27/01/2010 12:11:15 AM 711 Views
Good thing reality is chosen through consensus. *NM* Ghavrel - 27/01/2010 12:17:17 AM 149 Views
umm it is survey on trust random thoughts - 27/01/2010 12:47:04 AM 308 Views
Of course it's an accurate poll. But my point is that trust has nothing to do with accuracy. *NM* Ghavrel - 27/01/2010 01:14:59 AM 129 Views
do you have any real evidience that Fox is less acurate? random thoughts - 27/01/2010 01:28:22 AM 278 Views
Does the poll suggest otherwise? Ghavrel - 27/01/2010 02:32:14 AM 266 Views
well... PhotoJim - 27/01/2010 12:37:40 AM 275 Views
Good for Fox. Legolas - 27/01/2010 12:38:39 AM 314 Views
Not really that surprising random thoughts - 27/01/2010 01:00:52 AM 331 Views
Well, I did say it was remarkable particularly for foreigners. Legolas - 27/01/2010 01:58:43 AM 330 Views
I don't think their bias is their problem random thoughts - 27/01/2010 02:57:33 AM 385 Views
I've always liked ABC's World News Tonight. Ghavrel - 27/01/2010 03:44:59 AM 263 Views
Jim Lehrer, definetly *NM* Isaac - 27/01/2010 04:11:17 AM 136 Views
That would be my most trusted TV news source. Joel - 27/01/2010 07:22:51 AM 260 Views
I don't watch much PBS news random thoughts - 27/01/2010 02:04:12 PM 269 Views
Yes, but The NewsHour has been criticized for being too conservative. *NM* Ghavrel - 27/01/2010 07:01:32 PM 229 Views
well there are people who think Nancy Pelosi is to conserative *NM* random thoughts - 27/01/2010 08:13:56 PM 171 Views
Re: Not really that surprising MightyYT - 27/01/2010 06:18:34 PM 262 Views
That is why I chose what I am going to watch based on the show and not the network random thoughts - 27/01/2010 06:56:24 PM 260 Views
I am sad for this country after hearing this. *NM* Aisha - 27/01/2010 01:45:18 AM 228 Views
Re: Fox is most trusted name in news Dominic - 27/01/2010 02:51:04 AM 379 Views
Precisely. *NM* ironclad - 27/01/2010 11:26:15 AM 134 Views
A generation ago, the only news channel on TV was CNN. MightyYT - 27/01/2010 06:20:07 PM 274 Views
Hmmm....now here's the question: Great Lord of Chaos - 27/01/2010 03:10:02 AM 276 Views
PPP has a poor record Isaac - 27/01/2010 05:01:57 AM 276 Views
And CNN is SECOND?!!! What a badly broken poll.... Joel - 27/01/2010 07:16:09 AM 259 Views
It would be interesting to see how that breaks down by party snoopcester - 27/01/2010 12:09:51 PM 284 Views
the article does break it down by party random thoughts - 27/01/2010 02:06:50 PM 274 Views
Only for FOX, which makes trying to analyse it impossible snoopcester - 27/01/2010 02:51:46 PM 276 Views
here is a link to the full results random thoughts - 27/01/2010 03:02:50 PM 368 Views
So the parties are pretty much going each way Floffe - 27/01/2010 04:19:59 PM 272 Views
Re: So the parties are pretty much going each way snoopcester - 27/01/2010 04:36:08 PM 259 Views
I guess it makes sense random thoughts - 27/01/2010 11:33:25 PM 260 Views
It does snoopcester - 28/01/2010 12:09:14 PM 255 Views
They also treat them like a single group which I find ironic random thoughts - 30/01/2010 05:40:28 PM 264 Views
I personally think both sides are wrong random thoughts - 27/01/2010 04:40:36 PM 260 Views
Besides the fact who wins or loses, it's a very sad state of affairs for democracy... Artsapat - 27/01/2010 01:15:34 PM 255 Views
Skepticism is usually a good sign in a democracy Isaac - 27/01/2010 02:18:58 PM 384 Views
Re: Skepticism is usually a good sign in a democracy callandor1000 - 28/01/2010 03:42:55 AM 346 Views
Well, at least Fox is better than the BBC AgentOrange - 27/01/2010 01:43:32 PM 268 Views
I'm fairly certain you don't really mean that... Legolas - 27/01/2010 05:33:47 PM 281 Views
One does wonder. jh - 27/01/2010 05:52:30 PM 284 Views
Re: One does wonder. Aisha - 28/01/2010 04:28:47 AM 260 Views
Re: One does wonder. snoopcester - 28/01/2010 12:12:48 PM 258 Views
haha you got me. Though I do mean it. AgentOrange - 30/01/2010 12:36:03 AM 271 Views
Well, that's me unsurprised. nossy - 27/01/2010 02:23:16 PM 289 Views
Re: Well, that's me unsurprised. Macharius - 27/01/2010 02:31:57 PM 262 Views
Re: Well, that's me unsurprised. snoopcester - 27/01/2010 02:53:04 PM 265 Views
I'm still friends with the crotchety old secretary who used to work with me. nossy - 27/01/2010 03:24:45 PM 268 Views
It was the most watched cable channel last week random thoughts - 27/01/2010 03:08:36 PM 260 Views
You can't offend me by saying that. nossy - 27/01/2010 03:23:26 PM 248 Views
I know random thoughts - 27/01/2010 04:23:18 PM 279 Views
I almost said something earlier. nossy - 27/01/2010 06:34:18 PM 238 Views
Was the poll done in a trailerpark where everyone was their own uncle? Sophy - 27/01/2010 06:59:01 PM 298 Views
I think the same thing everytime I see European TV random thoughts - 27/01/2010 08:13:13 PM 250 Views
Re: Was the poll done in a trailerpark where everyone was their own uncle? callandor1000 - 28/01/2010 03:49:10 AM 237 Views
That's like saying so-and-so won a Grammy. Panorphaeon - 27/01/2010 07:39:54 PM 232 Views
That's like going a high security prison for a visit callandor1000 - 28/01/2010 03:38:45 AM 250 Views
telephone polls are no longer an accurate representation of popular opinion ranagrande - 28/01/2010 04:12:52 AM 229 Views
I verbally abuse people who call to poll me. I'm going to keep doing it. callandor1000 - 28/01/2010 04:21:20 AM 326 Views
funny how people suddenly dismiss polls when they say something they don't like random thoughts - 28/01/2010 05:57:10 AM 255 Views
Well, personally I never said anything about the poll being invalid. Ghavrel - 28/01/2010 06:57:43 AM 236 Views
Funnily, the first person who did that is Issac who has seemed a right wing type to me. snoopcester - 28/01/2010 12:19:05 PM 262 Views
I there is nothing wrong with questioning what a poll tells us random thoughts - 28/01/2010 02:02:29 PM 262 Views
Those where the only type of replies I saw though snoopcester - 28/01/2010 02:24:55 PM 239 Views
I made it a comment to main thread for a reason random thoughts - 28/01/2010 04:22:14 PM 243 Views
Isaac, not Issac Isaac - 30/01/2010 07:10:20 AM 248 Views
Bah, I only have your word for that being how your spell your name snoopcester - 01/02/2010 01:08:24 PM 361 Views
It's pretty much the only Anglic spelling of it Isaac - 01/02/2010 02:15:45 PM 297 Views
I would have complained about the telephony regardless of the results ranagrande - 28/01/2010 01:55:03 PM 234 Views
I've pretty much stopped watching news on TV BlackAdder - 29/01/2010 04:18:44 PM 247 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes