Active Users:689 Time:18/09/2026 05:42:29 AM
Whose complaint is valid? Legolas Send a noteboard - 02/02/2010 01:55:58 AM
I'm hoping you agree with me that calling the author of that reply "an Islamophobe" is idiotic and evidence of a mentality that's almost as black and white as what he's reproaching the "Islamophobes". Nitpicking about robbery or arson really doesn't change the validity of this guy's point.
Reply to message
All Terrorists are Muslims… except the 94% that aren’t. - 01/02/2010 10:42:12 PM 2108 Views
I find that unsurprising. - 01/02/2010 11:31:43 PM 741 Views
Lot of BS in there - 01/02/2010 11:33:08 PM 871 Views
I'm afraid I have to agree with this. - 01/02/2010 11:46:02 PM 791 Views
Well, no. Robbery accounts for a very small percentage of those attacks. Look at the chart. - 01/02/2010 11:50:39 PM 750 Views
I found the so-called Islamophobic reply... allow me to quote it in its entirety. - 01/02/2010 11:52:37 PM 786 Views
It's a valid complaint. *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:49:08 AM 322 Views
Whose complaint is valid? - 02/02/2010 01:55:58 AM 738 Views
Yours. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:15:01 AM 339 Views
I did note the rampant bias. - 01/02/2010 11:48:55 PM 891 Views
What about attacks on Iraqi police volunteers? - 01/02/2010 11:53:58 PM 755 Views
it only included attacks on American soil *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:16 PM 344 Views
Most of the Iraq violence isn't against the foreign occupier... - 01/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 793 Views
Ahem... /\ /\ /\ - 01/02/2010 11:56:34 PM 809 Views
Dude, 46 seconds. I was typing it while you posted. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:05:44 AM 319 Views
True, but I was referring to attacks on US soldiers. - 02/02/2010 01:47:55 AM 773 Views
That's still a bad benchmark - 02/02/2010 10:00:23 AM 879 Views
You would be very wrong - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM 820 Views
Um, since when is all Mid-East terrorism against foreign occupiers? - 02/02/2010 12:33:13 AM 938 Views
I would agree with this. - 02/02/2010 02:33:47 AM 848 Views
It was bound to happen sooner or later. - 02/02/2010 04:10:13 AM 902 Views
This is the only problem I have with "definitions" - 02/02/2010 04:51:00 AM 774 Views
You're conflating two types of fighters who shouldn't be, I believe. - 03/02/2010 06:16:21 AM 784 Views
I think you missed the point. - 05/02/2010 05:15:40 AM 771 Views
One of us did. - 05/02/2010 08:26:07 AM 943 Views
I'm not talking ETHICALLY or MORALLY - 14/02/2010 06:41:32 PM 763 Views
I was, or at least speaking legally. - 15/02/2010 06:54:50 AM 825 Views
Churchill's justification of bombings cited civilians as the targets, IIRC - 03/02/2010 12:46:16 AM 1000 Views
I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 03/02/2010 04:23:44 AM 928 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 05/02/2010 02:22:10 AM 1115 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 15/02/2010 09:46:48 AM 951 Views
Lame. - 01/02/2010 11:55:50 PM 704 Views
Demographics are the key, methinks. - 02/02/2010 12:20:46 AM 888 Views
WTF? Are these people serious? - 02/02/2010 02:19:05 AM 777 Views
Ah, good. I've driven you out of lurking. Now recommend me operas. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:41:30 AM 325 Views
Huh? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:24 PM 337 Views
I made a survey on musicals and operas on the board! - 02/02/2010 05:15:45 PM 709 Views
I agree with tom - 02/02/2010 02:54:53 AM 797 Views
So what? - 02/02/2010 02:23:42 AM 825 Views
Waco were terrorist? Do they just make this crap up? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:00:40 PM 529 Views
leftist dhimmi allies... rofl - 04/02/2010 04:56:48 AM 761 Views

Reply to Message