Active Users:2595 Time:19/06/2026 11:47:02 AM
Whose complaint is valid? Legolas Send a noteboard - 02/02/2010 01:55:58 AM
I'm hoping you agree with me that calling the author of that reply "an Islamophobe" is idiotic and evidence of a mentality that's almost as black and white as what he's reproaching the "Islamophobes". Nitpicking about robbery or arson really doesn't change the validity of this guy's point.
Reply to message
All Terrorists are Muslims… except the 94% that aren’t. - 01/02/2010 10:42:12 PM 2040 Views
I find that unsurprising. - 01/02/2010 11:31:43 PM 689 Views
Lot of BS in there - 01/02/2010 11:33:08 PM 803 Views
I'm afraid I have to agree with this. - 01/02/2010 11:46:02 PM 740 Views
Well, no. Robbery accounts for a very small percentage of those attacks. Look at the chart. - 01/02/2010 11:50:39 PM 706 Views
I found the so-called Islamophobic reply... allow me to quote it in its entirety. - 01/02/2010 11:52:37 PM 726 Views
It's a valid complaint. *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:49:08 AM 290 Views
Whose complaint is valid? - 02/02/2010 01:55:58 AM 692 Views
Yours. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:15:01 AM 309 Views
I did note the rampant bias. - 01/02/2010 11:48:55 PM 822 Views
What about attacks on Iraqi police volunteers? - 01/02/2010 11:53:58 PM 707 Views
it only included attacks on American soil *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:16 PM 318 Views
Most of the Iraq violence isn't against the foreign occupier... - 01/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 742 Views
Ahem... /\ /\ /\ - 01/02/2010 11:56:34 PM 750 Views
Dude, 46 seconds. I was typing it while you posted. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:05:44 AM 296 Views
True, but I was referring to attacks on US soldiers. - 02/02/2010 01:47:55 AM 702 Views
That's still a bad benchmark - 02/02/2010 10:00:23 AM 814 Views
You would be very wrong - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM 759 Views
Um, since when is all Mid-East terrorism against foreign occupiers? - 02/02/2010 12:33:13 AM 880 Views
I would agree with this. - 02/02/2010 02:33:47 AM 799 Views
It was bound to happen sooner or later. - 02/02/2010 04:10:13 AM 837 Views
This is the only problem I have with "definitions" - 02/02/2010 04:51:00 AM 716 Views
You're conflating two types of fighters who shouldn't be, I believe. - 03/02/2010 06:16:21 AM 708 Views
I think you missed the point. - 05/02/2010 05:15:40 AM 706 Views
One of us did. - 05/02/2010 08:26:07 AM 889 Views
I'm not talking ETHICALLY or MORALLY - 14/02/2010 06:41:32 PM 713 Views
I was, or at least speaking legally. - 15/02/2010 06:54:50 AM 761 Views
Churchill's justification of bombings cited civilians as the targets, IIRC - 03/02/2010 12:46:16 AM 946 Views
I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 03/02/2010 04:23:44 AM 856 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 05/02/2010 02:22:10 AM 1051 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 15/02/2010 09:46:48 AM 889 Views
Lame. - 01/02/2010 11:55:50 PM 650 Views
Demographics are the key, methinks. - 02/02/2010 12:20:46 AM 816 Views
WTF? Are these people serious? - 02/02/2010 02:19:05 AM 727 Views
Ah, good. I've driven you out of lurking. Now recommend me operas. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:41:30 AM 299 Views
Huh? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:24 PM 310 Views
I made a survey on musicals and operas on the board! - 02/02/2010 05:15:45 PM 661 Views
I agree with tom - 02/02/2010 02:54:53 AM 722 Views
So what? - 02/02/2010 02:23:42 AM 761 Views
Waco were terrorist? Do they just make this crap up? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:00:40 PM 496 Views
leftist dhimmi allies... rofl - 04/02/2010 04:56:48 AM 715 Views

Reply to Message