Active Users:801 Time:07/11/2025 01:35:37 AM
You would be very wrong random thoughts Send a noteboard - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM
the majority of attacks have been against civilians. At the height of the violence they were finds around 100 bodies a day and that doesn't count the thousands that were killed by car bombs. They are still blowing up markets.

The vast majority of Muslim terrorist attacks are committed against other Muslim not the “occupiers” who were trying to prevent it.
Reply to message
All Terrorists are Muslims… except the 94% that aren’t. - 01/02/2010 10:42:12 PM 1891 Views
I find that unsurprising. - 01/02/2010 11:31:43 PM 547 Views
Lot of BS in there - 01/02/2010 11:33:08 PM 672 Views
I'm afraid I have to agree with this. - 01/02/2010 11:46:02 PM 617 Views
Well, no. Robbery accounts for a very small percentage of those attacks. Look at the chart. - 01/02/2010 11:50:39 PM 577 Views
I found the so-called Islamophobic reply... allow me to quote it in its entirety. - 01/02/2010 11:52:37 PM 596 Views
It's a valid complaint. *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:49:08 AM 230 Views
Whose complaint is valid? - 02/02/2010 01:55:58 AM 565 Views
Yours. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:15:01 AM 239 Views
I did note the rampant bias. - 01/02/2010 11:48:55 PM 679 Views
What about attacks on Iraqi police volunteers? - 01/02/2010 11:53:58 PM 581 Views
it only included attacks on American soil *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:16 PM 246 Views
Most of the Iraq violence isn't against the foreign occupier... - 01/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 608 Views
Ahem... /\ /\ /\ - 01/02/2010 11:56:34 PM 625 Views
Dude, 46 seconds. I was typing it while you posted. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:05:44 AM 232 Views
True, but I was referring to attacks on US soldiers. - 02/02/2010 01:47:55 AM 575 Views
That's still a bad benchmark - 02/02/2010 10:00:23 AM 670 Views
You would be very wrong - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM 623 Views
Um, since when is all Mid-East terrorism against foreign occupiers? - 02/02/2010 12:33:13 AM 740 Views
I would agree with this. - 02/02/2010 02:33:47 AM 662 Views
It was bound to happen sooner or later. - 02/02/2010 04:10:13 AM 701 Views
This is the only problem I have with "definitions" - 02/02/2010 04:51:00 AM 574 Views
You're conflating two types of fighters who shouldn't be, I believe. - 03/02/2010 06:16:21 AM 562 Views
I think you missed the point. - 05/02/2010 05:15:40 AM 572 Views
One of us did. - 05/02/2010 08:26:07 AM 754 Views
I'm not talking ETHICALLY or MORALLY - 14/02/2010 06:41:32 PM 587 Views
I was, or at least speaking legally. - 15/02/2010 06:54:50 AM 631 Views
Churchill's justification of bombings cited civilians as the targets, IIRC - 03/02/2010 12:46:16 AM 769 Views
I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 03/02/2010 04:23:44 AM 719 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 05/02/2010 02:22:10 AM 908 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 15/02/2010 09:46:48 AM 750 Views
Lame. - 01/02/2010 11:55:50 PM 525 Views
Demographics are the key, methinks. - 02/02/2010 12:20:46 AM 679 Views
WTF? Are these people serious? - 02/02/2010 02:19:05 AM 616 Views
Ah, good. I've driven you out of lurking. Now recommend me operas. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:41:30 AM 230 Views
Huh? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:24 PM 248 Views
I made a survey on musicals and operas on the board! - 02/02/2010 05:15:45 PM 535 Views
I agree with tom - 02/02/2010 02:54:53 AM 578 Views
So what? - 02/02/2010 02:23:42 AM 622 Views
Waco were terrorist? Do they just make this crap up? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:00:40 PM 432 Views
leftist dhimmi allies... rofl - 04/02/2010 04:56:48 AM 570 Views

Reply to Message